Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JULY 22,1998 <br />Mis. Scalze introduced the followii~g resolution and moved its adoption: <br />KE.S'07,[ITION NO. 98-7-773 -AAPOINTINC TFIE DE73T LEVY <br />XEDUCTION CO~YIrY17TTEE AS IZECOMMEND~l) BY TFIE CITY <br />ADNIINISTR~I 'lOlt <br />"Che fore~oing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. <br />Ayes (5) Sc11ze, LaValle, Morel~n, Pedersen, Pahey. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />KANDICE The City Administr~tor review his memo dated July 17, 1998 <br />HEIGFITS recoinmending elimination ofthe guarantee oftax increment shortfall <br />TIF fi~om the Kandice I-teights I and [I Development Agreements. The <br />GUARANTEE Adininistrator indicated that staff had been concerned tl~~t witl~ a reduction <br />in class rates tl~ere would be insufficient incremenY to cover debt service. <br />However, upon an~lyzin~ Yhe TIF district, even witl~ a reduced class rate, <br />the district still has sufficient clsh flow to retire debt service payments. <br />However, the City will not be generating a sur}~lus of fax increment <br />}~roceecls until after debt is retired to f~ind any fiu~ther pro~erty acquisitions <br />in this area unless there is a project associated with the purchase. <br />The Administrator further pointed o~it~ Chat the sales price of I{andice <br />Heights 1 will lil<ely incre~se the marl<et val~ie that will ~enerate more TIF. <br />The Administrator su~gested thaC IetCing normal inarl<et factors worl< will <br />notjeopardize the Pinancial well bein~ ofthe CiCy, will not create a <br />com~efitive disadvanta~e for the propeity, 1nd will allow for the <br />elimination of the guarantee of a"C1F~ sllortfal(. <br />Fahey aslced if the increment would equ11 the reduced eiass rate. <br />The Administrltor replied thlt the iucrement is calculated at a frozen tax <br />rate of l 12% for this district. The Admi~~istrator pointed out that the <br />ICandice I-Ieights properties pay taxesjust Iil<e any other property. <br />However, with the chan~es in the property tax system, no one envisioned <br />the effect on this project. <br />The Administrator reported the property l~as not cash-t7owed, and the <br />owner has been required to mal<e up the difference to clsh flow the debt <br />service. <br />Scalze asl<ed if the chan~e in e(ass rates is having the same effect on other <br />TIF projer,ts across the State. <br />