Laserfiche WebLink
1VIINUTGS <br />CTTY COUNCI~L <br />AUGUST 2G, 1998 <br />ROUND ~LAI« The City Administralor reported th~tt another $75,940 is needed from <br />PROPERTY the P~rl< L~nd Acq~iisition F~intl to f~illy fund Che acquisition of properties <br />ACQU1SITiONS 21ong Round Lal<e. This Is' d~ie to acquisiCion occurrin~ faster than <br />inifi~liy anticipated. `I'his properfy will be used f'or open space, and the <br />Parl<s & Recreation Commission has rati(ied the request Por ldditional <br />doll~rs 6'om the I^und. <br />Mr. Morelan int~roducecl the foliowin~ resoluYion and moved its adoption: <br />RESOl.UT/ON N0. JN-8-201 -AYPROV/NG TfIE A/.LOCATION OF <br />~75,940 FRO&17'FIE Pfll2K I.AND AC~UISITION FUND TO FULI.Y <br />FUND AC'QUISIT/ON OF ROCIND LA/fG PROPERT/E,S 13ASED ON <br />THE RECOMMGNDA'170~Y OF 7'HE P, llZKS AND RECRF_ATION <br />COA~IN/LS".S`/ON <br />The forcgoing resolution was d~ily secondeci l~y Scalze. <br />Ayes (5) Morelan, Sc~lze, Pe<lersen, LaV~lle, F~hey. <br />Nays (0). Resol~ition declared adopted. <br />2G00 RiCI~: Nlessrs. Jay Reilin~ and Charles Dr~l<e, the new owners of 2600 Rice <br />STR~~'C StreeY, appeared belore the Council co disciiss their p(ans for the <br />renov~tion ofthis property. These plans were detlilecl in correspondence <br />to the Council. <br />Morel~n asl<ed if they wer~. aw~re oFthe City's architecturll ouidelines <br />which ~vould apply to this property. Reilin~ replied that tliey were. <br />More(an asl<ed if the new owners were ~oing to maintain tl~e existin~ car <br />wash or renovate it inCo ofiiceh~etail space. 2eiling replied that Yhey are <br />leanin~ t~oward renovatin~ the existin~ car wash into an office/ret~til <br />building. If thtit decision is made, Reilin~ indicated that detailed plans <br />wotild be s~ibmit~ted to t~he City for review. There have been no occupanYs <br />ident'ifed for the space at this time. <br />Fal~ey ~~uinted out that the City is looi<in~ at the redevelo~ment of this <br />area, and that t'here is property to the nort'h whicl~ may be part of fhis <br />redevelopment~ siPe. <br />L~Valie express~d concern that the new owners would put inoney into the <br />c~r wash and that the C:ity would decide the property is needed to relocate <br />displaced businesses from the Rice Street/Little Canada Road <br />redevelopment site. LaValle FeiY th~f the City should be up-front about its <br />potenti~l inlerest in the property. <br />4 <br />