My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-23-98 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
09-23-98 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 5:04:43 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:58:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MiNUTE5 <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />SEPTEMBER 23, 1998 <br />SECOND There was no one from the general public present wishing to comment <br />ADDiTION on this matter. <br />Upon motion by Scalze, seconded by Pedersen, the public hearing was <br />closed. <br />Mrs. Scaize introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOI. UTION NO. 98-9-225 - VACATING THE DRAINAGE AND <br />IJTII.ITY EASEMENT ALONG THE SHARED LOT I,INE FOR LOTS <br />1 AND 2, 73I,OCK l, FREDERICKSHAVEN.SECOND ADDITION <br />SUI3.IECT TO THE TWO I.OT.S 13EING COM737NED INTO ONE <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. <br />Ayes (5) Scalze, LaValle, Pedersen, Morelan, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />CUP TO ALLOW Mayor Fahey opened the public nearing to consider the application made <br />SHED/ by Hardees' Restaurant, 3354 Rice Street, for an amendment to their <br />ENCLOSURE - Conditional Use Permit allowing a shed/enclosure on their property. It <br />3354 RICE STR: was noted that the Planning Commission recommended approval of this <br />HARDEES' CUP amr;ndment. <br />Fahey asked if the building materials used for the shed met the City's <br />architectural guidelines. The City Planner noted that the shed is painted to <br />match the building. The Planner also noted that the structure is <br />insignificant in relation to the Hardees' buildin~, and felt there was no <br />problem from the standpoint ofthe architectural standards. <br />There was no one present from the general public presenting wishing to <br />comment on this matter. <br />Upon motion by LaValle, seconded by Morelan, the public hearing was <br />closed. <br />The City Administrator reported that the shed had a roof on it, which was <br />removed ~iven that a roof would trigger additional buildin~ code issues <br />which must be complied with. Therefore, the structure that the Council is <br />acting upon is more of a screening-type enclosure. <br />Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.