12-15-99 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL DECEMB~R 15,1999 Fahey agreed there should be some architectural review to make sure buildings are consistent with the neighborhood. He indicated that he supported as little impediment on the property owners as possible, while still ensuring an aesthetically pleasing building. The Planner indicated that the purpose statement of the B-I District could be modified to include the requirement for architectural review. Architectural review would be used to ensure that any new construction would be compatible with residential structures. The Planner noted that currently the Plannin~ Commission is the Architectural Review Board recommending to the Council for final approval. Robert Buetow reported that his intentions are to add on to the existin~ structure on his property. He is proposing a stucco exterior and the building will have a residential appearance. Buetow pointed out, however, that how he upgrades the building will depend on the soil conditions of the property. The City Planner suggested the architectural review process rather than the CUP process. Morelan asked if all building materials would be allowed subject to architectural review. Morelan noted that if the I-P District material standards are used, a square block buildin~ could be constructed. Therefore, he agreed that the architectural review process would be better. Bartholie indicated that some buildin~ materials must be permitted. He suggested the building materials listed in the I-P District with the addition of stucco, steel, and wood. Fahey indicated that his concern was the impact that the building design would have on the adjacent neighborhood more than the materials issue. Therefore, agreed that the architectural review process was preferable and would result in a development more consistent with the neighborhood. Bartholie pointed out that without standards, the architectural review would be totally arbitrary. Fahey suggested that the architectural review be conducted as part of the plan check review, rather than having to go through the Architectural Review Board. If there is a dispute with the review, the applicant would then have the option of addressing the Council on the issue.