08-26-09 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CI'I'X COUNCIL JUNr 27, 2007 Atlatn noted that the PUD ordinance lists several potetztially allowed uses, and asked about outdoor displays for these various retarl establislnmettts. Blesener suggested that the site plan would show the size and location of the outdoor display area, and this is the area that would be limited to that type of use, '11ze Plamner again indicated the need for a site plan indicating size and location. He noted that the City would want to ensure tlnaf there is no disruption to trafl'ie on site and minimutzr loss of parking area. The City Administrator indicated that the truck load sales and seasonal outdoor displays would be subject to the City's Temporary Outdoor Sales and Displays Permits. Businesses are limited do two permits per year with each permit to be for up to a two-week consecutive period. The City Adnninistratox indicated that these specific regulations can be written unto the PUD Agreement fox this property. }3lesener asked about the 40% anchor tenant requirement recommended by the P)anuing Commission. The City Planner indicated that the intent was to ensure that there was one large tenant and that the property would not end up being amulti-tenant mall. Allan agreed that this would be a concern without the anchor tenant requirement. The City Administrator noted that the 40% requiretznetzt is trot specific to Flom I^urniture. The requirement is for an anchor tenant to occupy a minimum of 40% of the space. He Indicated that once adopted, the PUD Agreement would Izave to be amended to change this requirement. Johansen stated that his coarcern w<ts that the requirement was specific to I-Iom Furnitw•e. The City Planner indicated that it was not, and relates to any tunehor tenant that would meet the PUD requircanettts. Johansen stated that this should not be a concern for tine bank, but suggested that the lower tine percentage the better. Johansen suggested 35% rather than 40%. He indicated that I-Tom Furniture's intention right now is to occupy over 50% of tlne building space. Council was agreeable to reducitng the percentage to 35% as requested by Jolzatnsen. Johansen requested that the Council increase the size of the temporary signage that they would be allowed to 108 square feet given the distance that the building is from the fi•ceway. Johansen indicated that the 32 foot maximum under the City's Code would not be visible..Iohansen also pointed out the need for leasing signage. The City Planner indicated that leasing signage is regulated under a separate section of tho Code, not tlne temporary sign code. 4