Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> MINUTES <br /> <br /> CITY COUNCIL <br /> OCTOBrR 19, 2010 <br /> Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br /> The property owner of 2410 Sunrise Drive appeared before the Council indicating <br /> that his property is a corner lot. He questioned the how the assessment was <br /> determined, noting that the proposal is to assess the long side of the lot at ] 00% <br /> and the short side at 20%. The property owner noted that his house fronts toward <br /> the short side of the lot. It was noted that the City's Assessment Policy calls for <br /> the front to be determined by driveway access, and the driveway is on the long <br /> side of the lot. In reviewing this situation it was the consensus of the Council that <br /> the short site of 2410 Sunrise Drive should be assessed at 100% given this is the <br /> direction that the home faces, and the long side at 20% classifying this side as the <br /> side yard. It was also noted that this is an equitable treatment of this property <br /> given both sides are being done at the same time. <br /> Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution acid moved its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 2010-10-249 -AMENDING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL <br /> FOR 2010-OS SUNRISE DRIVE MODIFYING THF. ASSESSMENT FOR <br /> 2410 SUNRISE DRIVE PROVIDING THAT THE SHORT SIDE OF THE <br /> LOT 1S ASSESSED AT 100 % AND THE LONG SIDE AT 2(I % WITH THE <br /> CITYABSORBING THE COST DIFFERENCE IN THE ASSESSMENT <br /> MODIFICATION <br /> The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Montour. <br /> Ayes (4). <br /> Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br /> IMP. NO. Mayor Blesener opened the Public Hearing to consider the adoption of the <br /> 2010-06 assessment roll for the improvement of Schletty Drive (north of Little Canada <br /> SCHLETTY Road) by mill and overlay of bituminous surface as well as concrete curb and <br /> DI2IV1; gutter repair and/or replacement. <br /> "fhe City Engineer reviewed the cost of the improvement noting that final <br /> construction costs were $31,047.21, of which $15,18 L 11 is proposed to be <br /> assessed. He indicated that the assessable cost to property owners is down <br /> slightly from what was estimated. <br /> The Engineer then reviewed assessment payment options noting that property <br /> owners can pay their assessment in full or part to the City within 30 days of <br /> adoption of the assessment (through November 18, 2010) with no interest. After <br /> that 30-day period, the unpaid assessment balance will be certified to Kamsey <br /> County and spread for collection with property taxes fora 10 year period at 5% <br /> interest. The Engineer noted that once an assessment balance is certified to the <br /> County, the property owner car pay it in full during the 10-year period. However, <br /> 5 <br /> <br />