My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-15-10 Additions
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
12-15-10 Additions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2010 7:03:23 AM
Creation date
12/16/2010 7:00:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that the capped rate has not yet been approved by the City Council but would be <br />by the next step in the process. <br />it was asked if there was an alternative to the project such as no curb and gutter. <br />Mr. Elfering answered that the road has been seal coated in the past but that <br />practice would not provide any long term improvement with the current condition <br />of the road. He thither stated that the City's policy is to urbanize the street <br />section to improve drainage and protect the edge of the road. It is possible to do <br />a rural section with no curb and gutter but the neighborhood would have to bear <br />the entire cost of the project. <br />A resident commented that he liked to back things into his yard and would not be <br />able to do so with the proposed barrier curb. Mr. Elfering replied that the City <br />could install surmountable curb if the neighborhood preferred it to barrier curb. <br />A resident commented that she lives on a corner lot and her sprinkler system gets <br />damaged by vehicles driving over her yard every year. Mr. Elfering stated that <br />curb and gutter would help solve that problem since plows and other vehicles can <br />feel the curb and would know to not stray any further. <br />A resident asked if the width of the proposed street would match the existing <br />street width. Mr. Elfering answered that it would be close. The new section <br />would be 29.5 feet from the back of curb to the back of curb. The current street <br />is about 30 feet wide. He added that there will be some grading necessary <br />outside the street section but his intention was to minimize the impacts. The <br />amount of grading would depend on soil conditions. The City Administrator <br />added that if the project moves forward the City would hold a plan review <br />meeting for the neighborhood to come in and look at the design and make <br />comments or ask questions. <br />It was asked if assessed values change based on utilities needing to be relocated. <br />Mr. Elfering said private utilities are responsible for the cost of moving their <br />utilities and there would be no effect on assessments. <br />There was a comment that a streetlight on the edge of a property would likely <br />need to be moved and would also need to be fixed since it was broken. Mr. <br />Elfering stated that the City would take a look at it. <br />There was a question on why residents of Dianna Lane were paying extra on their <br />electric bills for having underground electric lines. The City Administrator stated <br />he wasn't sure why that would be and said the City would look into it. <br />A resident asked why the assessment numbers go up when Reidmond Lane is <br />added to the project. Mr. Elfering answered that the reason is the front footages <br />on Reidmond are very large so the costs per frontage increase. Basically not <br />37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.