Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JANUARY 26, 2011 <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -1 -24 CONTINUING THE PUBLIC <br />HEARING ON THE NIELSEN APPLICATION FOR REZONING TO <br />1 -1 DISTRICT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OUTDOOR <br />STORAGE FOR PROPERTY AT 3075 SPRUCE STREET UNTIL THE <br />APRIL 27, 2011 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT THE REQUEST OF <br />THE APPLICANT <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Boss. <br />Ayes (5). <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />AMEND PUD Blesener opened the Public Hearing to consider an Amendment to <br />PERMIT Planned Unit Development Permit to allow a three -level addition of <br />ST. JUDE approximately 20,000 square feet consisting of manufacturing and <br />MEDICAL office space to the existing Phase I building for St. Jude Medical at One <br />St. Jude Drive. Blesener noted that the City Planner and the Planning <br />Commission have recommended approval subject to conditions. <br />The City Planner indicated that St. Jude Medical is proposing a 3- story, <br />20,000 square foot addition to the east side of their technology center <br />adjacent to the loading area. Exterior materials will be similar to the <br />existing building. The Planner noted that when the PUD was originally <br />approved for St. Jude, a future parking deck was anticipated to <br />accommodate the additional parking that would be needed. Under this <br />proposal, an additional 50+ parking spaces would be added on the south <br />side of the existing parking lot. The Planner noted that the applicant has <br />indicated that when the second phase of the technology center is <br />constructed, this parking would be removed and the parking deck added. <br />The Planner noted that the applicant was asked to verify that adequate <br />screening to the south residential area would be added, and they have <br />provided some information in that regard. He also noted that if the <br />additional parking proposed is not adequate, St. Jude can utilize the <br />existing parking supply to the east. The Planner indicated that the <br />proposal before the Council appears to be consistent with long -term <br />expansion plans. <br />The Planner then reviewed the recommended approval conditions outlined <br />in his January 6, 2011 report. He also noted that the City Engineer <br />submitted a report dated January 5, 2011 which also outlines approval <br />conditions. <br />Blesener asked the dimensions of the proposed addition. Nina <br />Eberhausen, Architectural Alliance, reported that the addition will extend <br />36 feet to the east and 150 feet wide matching the existing building. <br />2 <br />