Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />FEBRUARY 9, 2011 <br />conducted three community surveys in the past, those being in 1988, 1995, <br />and 2006. The 2006 survey contained approximately 110 question units. <br />There was discussion about the value that past surveys provided, with the <br />consensus being that they did provide valuable information and direction <br />to the City. The Administrator noted that 2012 will be a very tough year <br />for cities financially, and a survey would provide direction to the City in <br />terms of the continuation or elimination of various services relative to <br />their cost. <br />The Administrator also noted that at the Goal Setting Session there was <br />discussion about conducting a business survey. He noted that Decision <br />Resources recommendation would he to conduct a business focus group, <br />the cost of which would be $3,750. <br />Keis indicated that given the cost, he was not sure the survey was <br />necessary questioning the City's ability to reduce services such as policy, <br />fire, and public works. He indicated that he would be more in favor of <br />conducting a business focus group. The City Administrator explained that <br />given survey results are based on a 400 random sample, a focus group <br />format is preferred for the business community. <br />Relative to a residential survey, the Administrator indicated that some <br />issues that come to mind would be to gauge support for the Montreal <br />Courts officer position, whether or not the Demont skating rink should <br />remain closed or not, citizen support for the City's deer culling program. <br />Other issues include capital improvement projects such as the need for <br />park equipment replacement. The Administrator felt that a survey may <br />help the City prioritize some things. <br />McGraw indicated that he has reviewed the 2006 survey and was <br />impressed with it. McGraw felt that perhaps the number of question units <br />could be reduced so that the City can obtain valuable information at less <br />cost. McGraw noted the budget issues facing the City, thus the need to <br />determine which services are most valuable to citizens. He felt that issues <br />addressed in past surveys, such as the value of the City's newsletter, need <br />not be addressed. McGraw felt the survey would provide valuable <br />information to the Council in setting the 2012 Budget. He noted that <br />today's economic conditions are different from what they were five years <br />ago. <br />Blesener felt that the City should conduct a more targeted survey. He <br />noted that the City will be facing budget issue and it is important to find <br />out if citizens are willing to pay more to keep services, or where cuts <br />should be made. The Administrator indicated that a target survey will be <br />5 <br />