My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-09-11 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
02-09-11 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2011 2:35:09 PM
Creation date
2/14/2011 2:34:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />FEBRUARY 9, 2011 <br />doable. The key will be in controlling the structure of the survey. He felt, <br />however, that the cost of the survey may still be at $15,000. He suggested <br />that if the Council is in agreement that a survey is needed, a workshop <br />with Decision Resources be set to begin drafting questions. The <br />Administrator agreed that current economic conditions are different from <br />how they have been in the past. McGraw indicated that this is why he <br />feels it important to conduct a survey now. He noted that in 2006 <br />residents were willing to pay more to maintain services. This may not be <br />the case now. <br />Blesener noted Decision Resources' indication that business component <br />should be handled in a different manner than the residential survey. Keis <br />and Boss indicated that the business community would have different <br />concerns than the residential community. There was then general <br />discussion about the specifics of a business focus group. <br />Blesener suggested that a workshop be held to discuss the specifics of a <br />residential survey and business focus group with Decision Resources. The <br />City Administrator suggested that given the tight timeframe to get a <br />survey done, the Council decide on whether or not it wants to proceed <br />with a survey. If so, a workshop could be called at which time work <br />would begin on formulating questions. McGraw suggested that a target <br />price for a survey would be $10,000 with the business focus group an <br />additional $3,750. <br />Keis again expressed his hesitation about the survey, noting that the <br />majority of the City's budget expense relates to police, fire, and public <br />works. Montour pointed out that there are other City services that could <br />be gauged, such as should the Demont skating rink remain closed, <br />additional police protection at Montreal Courts, etc. <br />The City Administrator indicated that the City is facing some tough <br />decisions, and the question is what information does the Council want to <br />help make those decisions. The State will be cutting or eliminating aids to <br />the City, and either a tax increase will be necessary to maintain services or <br />services will have to be reduced. <br />McGraw stated that when it comes time to cut or reduce services, he <br />would rather have information from a number of taxpayers in the City than <br />from just a few. McGraw felt that the more information the Council can <br />have in this decision making process, the better. McGraw felt that the <br />number of survey questions could be managed if the City prioritizes the <br />information that it wants to gather. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.