06-08-11 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL JUNE 8, 2011 reported that yard waste included grass, twigs, and brush (branches 3 inches in diameter or less). He indicated that the hauler is not allowed to have yard waste in the trash that is brought to the Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF) facility. The City Administrator reported that the organized collection contract provides for the collection of yard waste for an additional fee of $48 per year. Approximately 25% of the residents take advantage of this program. The Administrator also pointed out that many property owners haul their yard waste to the County's compost sites. Again, yard waste cannot be put into the waste stream. Keogh again requested that the cost of yard waste pick -up be included in the cost of trash removal. Blesener noted that it could be included in the contract, but then everyone would pay an additional fee for the service. Blesener noted that under the current contract only those who want the service pay for it, which is about 25% of households. The City Administrator reported that the City is in the process of renegotiating the organized collection contract, but agreed that the haulers will not provide the yard waste service at no additional cost. Keogh asked about the condition of Round Lake. The Superintendent reported that the lake is potentially toxic and the big concern is with animals. The Watershed is continuously monitoring the condition of the lake. The Watershed has indicated that the toxicity levels have decreased, and they are hopeful the levels will decrease further. Keogh asked if the lake could be treated. The Superintendent reported that a good treatment method has not been found. The City Administrator indicated that current treatment methods are not without side effects. The Administrator pointed out that drought conditions over the past couple of years have contributed to the Round Lake problem, and it is hoped that more rainfall will help. The Watershed has been monitoring the lake for the past 10 years and will continue to do so. There was no one else present from the general public wishing to comment on this matter. Mr. Keis introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -6 -109 — ACCEPTING THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAM REPORT WAS SUBMITTED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS SUPERINTENDENT The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Boss. Ayes (3). Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. 3