My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-13-11 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
07-13-11 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2011 4:02:01 PM
Creation date
7/8/2011 3:56:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
&7 \. 55S ` anadr, <br />515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 55117 -1600 <br />(651) 766 -4029 / FAX: (651) 766 -4048 <br />www, ci.little- Canada. mn. us <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Mayor 13lesener & Members of the City Council <br />FItOM: Joel Hanson, City Administrator <br />DATE: July 8, 2011 <br />RE: Prohibition on the Sale & Use of Coal Tar Based Sealers <br />MAYOR <br />[3111 I3lcscner <br />COUNCIL <br />Rick Montour <br />John Kcis <br />Michael McGraw <br />Shelly Boss <br />ADMINISTRATOR <br />Joel R. Hanson <br />Maplewood and Roseville have recently adopted prohibitions on the sale and use of coal tar based <br />sealants used on asphalt driveways. White Bear Lake was the first city in Minnesota to enact such a <br />ban. The reason for these restrictions related the pollutants contained in this type of sealer. Polycyclic <br />Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAT -Is) have been found in concentrations sufficient to require the removal of <br />sediment to be treated as "hazardous materials" thereby increasing disposal costs. PAHs are also <br />believed to be harmful to fish and pose a cancer risk to humans with prolonged exposure. <br />The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency in conjunction with the League of Minnesota Cities prepared a <br />model ordinance to assist cities considering this prohibition. MPCA also had some good information on <br />this subject on their website, but it is not available for access during the State shutdown. They have also <br />been the driving force in promoting this prohibition by making it a condition of eligibility for grant <br />funding that can be used to offset the cost of pond maintenance when testing shows high PAI -Is in the <br />pond sediment. <br />The principal concern of staff is the enforcement of this type of ordinance. According to Cliff Aichinger <br />of Ramsey /Washington Metro Watershed District, the Minnesota Legislature considered a ban on these <br />products, but did not enact legislation because they did not want to "burden" retailers with the duty of <br />policing this issue, According to information staff reviewed, coal tar based sealers are not typically <br />available from most retail outlets these days. However, some small driveway sealing operators use this <br />type of product. <br />Staff is presenting this for your consideration and direction. Little Canada has not yet dealt with the <br />increased costs associated with PAI -Is being present in ponds we have dredged. However, that may not <br />always be true and if we do encounter this problem in the future, we may be in the position of seeking <br />grant assistance by having this ordinance in place. <br />I have attached materials from White )3ear Lake (ordinance and article), Roseville (staff report, <br />ordinance, and website info), and Maplewood (article) that provides greater background on the subject. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.