Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JULY 27, 2011 <br />McGraw asked how quickly a problem can be found with this system. <br />Plahn indicated that the remotes in each home are constantly <br />communicating with the data collector and then on to the City's computer <br />system. Each morning, or any time during the day, City staff can run a <br />triage report and problems would be apparent from that report. <br />Blesener asked about verifying sump pumps in homes at the same time <br />that meters are being installed. The Superintendent reported that the bid <br />included two additional options, the first for sump pump inspections in <br />homes that could be potential inflow and infiltration contributors. Dakota <br />Supply submitted a price of $5.33 per inspection and staff has listed 1,000 <br />as the possible number of inspections to be made. Staff is still evaluating <br />this option and will make a future recommendation to the Council. The <br />second additional option that was bid was for replacement of the first <br />valve if it goes bad during installation of the meter. Dakota quoted $85.08 <br />per valve. Staff estimated 200 as the quantity that may need to be <br />replaced. The Superintendent noted that the cost of valves is $20, and he <br />would propose that City staff handle this replacement. <br />Blesener asked how the meter replacement project would be paid for. The <br />Administrator indicated that the money would come from the Water and <br />Sewer Capital Replacement account which is funded by depreciation of <br />water and sewer in the respective enterprise funds. This is a very healthy <br />fund, and money has been set aside in this fund for this purpose. <br />Montour asked what system St. Paul has in place. The Superintendent <br />reported that they have a drive -by radio read system. <br />McGraw noted that the expenditure will be somewhat offset by the <br />savings in manually reading meters. The Superintendent reported that that <br />was correct. Additional savings will be realized since there will no longer <br />be the need to manually enter meter readings. There is also the customer <br />service factor to consider in early detection of leaks, etc. <br />The Administrator again pointed out that the cost of going to the fixed <br />network system is only $11,000 more than the drive -by reading system. <br />That will be a very quick payback given the savings in meter reading costs <br />and customer service enhancements. <br />Keis introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -7 -144 — AWARDING THE BID OF DAKOTA <br />SUPPLY GROUP IN THE AMOUNT OF $553,876.14 FOR A FIXED <br />NETWORK METER READING SYSTEM, DECLINING THE <br />OPTION FOR VALVE REPLACEMENT, AND RESERVING THE <br />15 <br />