My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-11-08 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
06-11-08 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2011 3:24:13 PM
Creation date
10/19/2011 3:18:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JANUARY 14, 1999 <br />Administrator look at the options available to the City for allowing this <br />business to continue. <br />Scalze pointed out that this business is outside storage to the max. <br />LaVaile indicated that he would rather see the stockpiling and recycling <br />business with a $100,000 building on the property than the pole buildings <br />in Ryan Industrial Park which have junk cars, tires, and other debris <br />spread over the property. <br />Fahey stated that he had no problem with outside storage as long as it was <br />properly screened. Fahey noted that Ryan Industrial Park is a place to do <br />business. However, the area needs to be cleaned up. With regard to the <br />Frattalone stockpiling/recycling business, Fahey stated that he is not <br />opposed to extending the agreement and recommended that staff craft <br />something that meets the majority view of the Council. <br />Scalze felt any extensions must have a legal basis. Scalze also pointed out <br />that other cities do not want this type of business. <br />Fahey directed the City Attorney and City Administrator to prepare a <br />recommendation for the Council's next meeting. <br />TRI- DISTRICT Mr. Fred Storti, Tri- District School, appeared before the Council and <br />SCHOOL provided a brief history on the Tri- District School, its purpose and <br />UTILITY mission, as well as how it is funded. Storti pointed out that the City's <br />CONNECTION $160,000 assessment for water and sewer connection was not anticipated <br />AGREEMENT at the time the school was constructed. That assessment was levied at a <br />7% interest rate, and the school currently owes the City $180,000 as a <br />result of the accruing interest. Storti reported that he has met with the City <br />Administrator to discuss the assessment and interest rate and had <br />requested that the City lower its rate to 6 %. Storti asked the Administrator <br />what the cost of interest is to the City on an improvement like this. <br />The City Administrator replied that the City's cost is typically 1.5% to 2% <br />lower than the rate it passes on to property owners. The additional 1.5% <br />to 2% in interest is to cover the City's administrative costs. The <br />Administrator reported that the last project assessed was at a 6.5% interest <br />rate for a ten -year period. <br />Morelan pointed out that interest rates are dropping, and suggested that the <br />School District obtain a loan to pay off the connection charge. The City <br />Administrator suggested that the issuance costs for a loan would negate <br />any decrease in interest rates. The Administrator was also unsure of the <br />School's ability to obtain a loan. <br />12 <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.