My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-11-08 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
06-11-08 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2011 3:24:13 PM
Creation date
10/19/2011 3:18:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JANUARY 27, 1999 <br />ORDINANCE NO. 481— AMENDING SECTION 902.010 OF <br />THE LITTLE CANADA ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING <br />TO THE DEFINITION OF SETBACKS <br />The foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Pedersen. <br />Ayes (5) Morelan, Pedersen, Fahey, LaValle, Scalze. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />FRATTALONE The City Administrator reported that he and the City Attorney have <br />RECYCLING been reviewing the facts relative to the Frattalone development <br />OPERATION agreement for recycling operation on Country Drive and the means <br />which should be used for allowing that operation to continue. <br />Based on that review, it is their recommendation that an interim <br />use zoning district be created and a license fee established. The <br />Administrator requested direction from the Council to prepare a <br />detailed report and proposed ordinance establishing the interim use <br />district. This would then be submitted to the Council for review <br />and adoption. <br />Morelan pointed out that if an interim use zoning district is created <br />then any property owner in the City could apply for rezoning to <br />this district. <br />The City Attorney replied that this is correct. He also indicated <br />that the interim use district would be established in such a way as <br />to have a termination date. <br />Scalze asked how a termination date could be enforced. <br />The City Attorney reported that the termination date would be <br />agreed to by the developer. <br />Morelan asked if there were any other alternatives for addressing <br />the recycling operation or if this was the most viable option. The <br />Administrator felt this was the most viable option. <br />Fahey suggested that another option would be to make recycling a <br />permitted use and allow it to continue indefinitely subject to a <br />license fee. <br />The City Attorney reported that he and the City Administrator have <br />not yet completed their review of the facts as to the exact status of <br />the existing use. However, it doesn't appear that the business is <br />14 <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.