06-25-08 Additions - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Waite asked who has ultimate control of Savage Lake. Aichinger replied that there are multiple authorities. Savage Lake falls under the Wetland Conservation Act, Watershed rules, and City land use regulations. Waite asked if the DNR has jurisdiction. Aichinger replied that the DNR regulates the Public Waters Act, and they have jurisdiction over the OHW. Waite indicated that when the weir structure was installed about 4'h years ago, it was like someone pulled the plug on Savage Lake. He also noted that there had never been water lilies on the lake before. Aichinger noted that there has been some speculation that someone introduced water lilies to Savage Lake. Waite noted that in 1991 then Council Member Bev Scalze had suggested a fishing pier be installed on Savage Lake. Waite pointed out that obviously the water levels were deep enough to support fish. Aichinger replied that the DNR has urban fishing programs wherein the stock fish. This occurs on bodies of water that are shallow and freeze out in the winter. There was additional discussion of the OHW for Savage Lake and Aichinger's position that none has been established for Savage Lake. Additional discussion occurred about the manipulated structure that the Watershed replaced with a weir at the request of the City. One property owner agreed with Smith's previous comment that replacement of the manipulated gate with the weir resulted in the current problems on Savage Lake. There was discussion about the impact of raising water level to the existing homes on Savage Lane and Rose Lane. The City Engineer noted that these homes existed prior to the installation of the weir structure. The City Administrator indicated that the Savage Lane cul -de -sac did flood on occasion due to poor drainage. That problem has since been corrected. Aichinger indicated that there are a couple of low spots, and indicated that the DNR will look at flood plain management in considering an increase in the water level. He noted there previous request for easements around Savage Lake when the level was raised a couple of years ago. The DNR did settle for signed agreements from the property owners rather than easements. One property owner indicated that when the highway went through, MN DOT condemned some of the property abutting Savage Lake for easements. Aichinger indicated that there is nothing of this nature recorded against the properties. One property owner summarized the solutions being discussed: The DNR be contacted to re- evaluate the OHW level for Savage Lake; The DNR be contacted to expand the area of water lily treatment on Savage; Investigation into the possibility of a grant to assist in the cost of water lily treatment. Aichinger indicated that he will contact the DNR hydrologist regarding the Savage Lake water level to determine if an adjustment can be made. If not, special legislation would have to be sought. McGraw suggested that if legislation is necessary, both Rep. Scalze and Sen. Marty be contacted.