Laserfiche WebLink
There was a question on how the two property owners would be compensated for <br />the additional right -of -way that would be acquired from their parcels. Mr. <br />Hanson stated that a procedure for determining a method for payment has not <br />been determined yet, but would follow statutory requirements. However, he <br />indicated that it would probably be similar to the amount and process used in <br />acquiring the property from Mr. Miller, as a part of the Nadeau Road extension. <br />He also commented that he would provide more information on the process if the <br />reconstruction project goes ahead. <br />The subject of why the additional 17 -feet of right -of -way couldn't be acquired <br />from the east side of the road was discussed at length. Mr. Hanson answered that <br />the City had already acquired additional right -of -way from the west side of the <br />street from a previous development that was completed in the mid 1980s, and <br />that if the additional right -of -way was acquired from the east it would create a <br />roadway that would zigzag, which would not be a safe and -practical roadway. <br />Also, only two properties remain to be acquired to achieve the additional 17 -feet <br />from the west side. So that would be the means to acquire the 50 -foot right -of- <br />way. <br />➢ It was discussed about reconstructing Condit Street to a rural section, which <br />means no curb and gutter. Mr. Hanson stated this is against City policy. He <br />stated we would note the request to the City Council. Mr. Elfering commented <br />that a street with curb and gutter typically lasts longer because the edges of the <br />rural section typically break up. He also mentioned that curb and gutter is better <br />for snow plowing because the drivers know where the edge of street is, and <br />therefore don't accidentally plow into a resident's lawn. Mr. Elfering also noted <br />that because of the existing street being so narrow that constructing the street to a <br />rural section at a typical city width does not necessary mean that trees will be <br />saved. <br />➢ One resident wondered if he got everyone on Condit to agree to have a no <br />parking condition on the street, that if the street width could be narrowed. Mr. <br />Hanson stated that may be a possibility, but Council would make the decision on <br />whether to allow the street to be narrower then the City's standard. <br />➢ A resident also wondered if they could allow parking on the narrower street for <br />special occasions if it was agreed upon by all other residences on Condit Street. <br />Mr. Hanson said that could not be possible because the no parking restrictions <br />would be in place for emergency vehicle access at all times, which any parking <br />on a 24 -foot wide street would restrict the access. <br />➢ It was asked if the trees could be moved instead of being cut down. Mr. Hanson <br />responded by saying that he believed that the trees in question were too large to <br />be moved. Mr. Elfering commented that during the design phase of the project, <br />that all options would be looked at to save as many trees as possible. He also <br />-3 <br />