Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF MINNESOTA <br />IN COURT OF APPEALS <br />C9 -99 -1967 <br />Stuart Nolan, et al., <br />Appellants, <br />Tom Hansen, et al., <br />Plaintiffs, <br />vs. <br />City of Eden Prairie, <br />Respondent, <br />James Perkins, et al., <br />Respondents. <br />Filed May 23, 2000 <br />Affirmed <br />Anderson, Judge <br />Hennepin County District Court <br />File No. 997377 <br />Considered and decided by Peterson, Presiding Judge, Kalitowski, Judge, and Anderson, Judge. <br />SYLLABUS <br />In reviewing the approval of a variance request for undue hardship under Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. <br />6(2), we consider whether the record adequately addresses three statutory factors -- reasonableness, <br />unique circumstances, and the essential character of the locality. <br />OPINION <br />ANDERSON, Judge <br />Appellants Stuart Nolan, et al., challenge the respondent City of Eden Prairie's approval of variances <br />related to a preliminary plat, contending that the approval was in violation of statute and ordinance, and <br />was arbitrary and capricious. Appellants also challenge approval of the preliminary plat, contending that a <br />council member who had an unlawful conflict of interest cast the deciding vote. We affirm. <br />FACTS <br />- 2 6 - <br />