Laserfiche WebLink
Renewal. Any approved special home occupation permit may be valid for a period of <br />one year, after which the permit may be reissued for periods of up to three years each. <br />Each application for the renewal of a permit will be considered as a new permit without <br />taking into consideration that a previous permit has been granted. Any application for <br />permit renewal shall be reviewed and subject to approval of the Zoning Administrator. <br />Lapse of Permit by Non -Use. Whenever within one year after granting a permit the <br />use as permitted by the permit shall not have been initiated, then such permit shall <br />become null and void unless a petition for extension of time in which to complete the <br />work has been granted by the City Council. Such extension shall be requested in writing <br />and filed with the Zoning Administrator at least thirty days before the expiration of the <br />original permit. <br />Alternative Actions <br />Regarding the application for a Home Occupation Permit for a spa use, the City has the <br />following options: <br />1. Motion to approve the Home Occupation Permit, based on a finding that the <br />proposed use meets the conditions of approval and will not jeopardize the health, <br />safety and general welfare of the surrounding neighborhood. <br />2. Motion to deny the Home Occupation Permit, based on a finding that the conditions <br />for approval have not been met. <br />Summary and Recommendation <br />The proposed spa use is considered to be a special home occupation, and requires a <br />special home occupation permit. The proposed use will not require any significant <br />alterations to the existing structure, and is not expected to propose any nuisance to the <br />surrounding neighborhood. However, staff is concerned with the number of employees <br />and the number of expected clients in a residential neighborhood. <br />The applicant is proposing three employees and one on -site manager. Only one of <br />these employees will be residing in the home. When discussing occupancy with staff, it <br />was noted that the "employee" expects to reside in one side of this structure, with the <br />home occupation being conducted in the other side. It is questionable as to whether <br />this complies with the "accessory use" aspect of the zoning ordinance. Staff expects <br />that the number of employees and clients will result in higher traffic volumes and <br />parking demands than would be typical of a single family neighborhood. This amount of <br />traffic and parking is similar to a commercial use, and does not appear to be compatible <br />with the typical expectations for a residential area. <br />