Laserfiche WebLink
The I-Ionora'olc <br />Minnesota House of Representatives <br />October 2, 2003 <br />Page 8 <br />pass ordinances regulating septic systems33; establish indivi ual sewage treatment or well <br />loan programs34; contract with the office of environmental assistance concerning location <br />and development of stabilization and containment faciliti s35; impose limited fees on <br />operators of facilities for disposal of solid waste within the county3u; and maintain county <br />water and sewer facilities.37 Counties have not been given the authority to regulate traffic <br />offenses other than in limited circumstances. Counties have also not been °ranted the <br />authority to hold administrative hearings and issue admini�uative penalties for ordinance <br />violations. It does not appear that such hearings are implied power necessary or <br />essential to carryout the express powers of' a county. However, like statutory cities, it <br />appears that statutory counties would need to obtain the pover to administer administrative <br />penalties from the legislature. <br />Ramsey County may have more authority to issue adminis Live penalties than the other <br />counties in the State because it is a home rule charter count . Like charter cities, Ramsey <br />County's charter dictates the duties and responsibilities of the county government. Its <br />charter allows it to pass ordinances issuing fines and pen Ities.i8 However, the County <br />could still not pass ordinances that conflict with State laws. <br />My office has spoken with several counties who believe cy should enact administrative <br />penalty provisions as a way to increase revenue, My office I as told them that they need to <br />obtain specific authority from the legislature prior to implementin; these penalties. <br />Other Legal Concerns <br />Even if the legislature granted municipalities the authority o issue administrative citations <br />and penalties, there are other concerns that would still n d to be addressed. We are <br />concerned that ordinance violation handled through adm istrative hearings may raise <br />Constitutional concerns because the administrative process may infringe on the district <br />court's original jurisdiction. <br />1. Role of Courts <br />Article VI, § 3 of the Minnesota Constitution provides: <br />The district court has original jurisdiction in all civil and criminal cases and <br />shall have appellate jurisdiction as prescribed by law. <br />Penalties for criminal violations are within the jurisdiction of the district court. Other <br />violations, even if civil in nature, appear to fall within the district court's jurisdiction. In <br />n <br />31 <br />36 <br />3 <br />3,, <br />Minn. Stat. § 1 15.55 (2002). <br />Minn. Stat. § 115.57, subd. 3 (2002). <br />Minn. Scat. § 11SA.19), subd. 1 (2002). <br />Minn 'nt. § 115A.919 (2002). <br />Minn I I6A.01, subds. 1 &2 (2002), <br />See 1,.,.; . County Caner § 5.01 (5). <br />- 2 3 - <br />