Laserfiche WebLink
ANALYSIS <br />The applicant is proposing 41 detached townhome style units on a 7.71 acre site. The <br />site is comprised of three parcels, two which are within the City of Little Canada. The <br />southern triangular piece is within the City of Maplewood. The calculations submitted <br />with the application indicate that the site is approximately 14 acres. However, GIS data <br />obtained from Ramsey County indicates that the site is only 7.71 acres. The portion of <br />the site located within the City of Little Canada is 5.49 acres. <br />The small lot single family homes will be arranged along a north -south private drive. <br />The site will be complimented by two ponds, a community center, and a trail system that <br />circles through the various common open space areas. <br />Lot Requirements and Setbacks. The underlying zoning of the site is R -1, single <br />family residential. The following chart illustrates the lot requirements and setback <br />requirements for the R -1 District, as well as what is proposed for the site. <br />Approximately ten units are within the City of Maplewood, with two units crossing <br />municipal boundaries. As such, only the units and acreage within the City of Little <br />Canada are included in the calculations below: <br />While some degree of flexibility to the standards of the zoning ordinance may be <br />allowed through PUD, the requested variances are quite significant. The lot area <br />proposed is nearly half of what is required for the R -1 District. The narrow lot width <br />appears to create very tight conditions, with homes roughly eight feet apart. A <br />significant front yard setback reduction is also requested, further intensifying the tight <br />setting. <br />Staff recommends that the applicant remove a number of units throughout the <br />development to create larger lots with more conforming setbacks. Specifically, staff <br />recommends that units be removed adjacent to the steep slope and in areas containing <br />dense tree cover. <br />Density. The proposed density for the site is approximately 6.08 units per acre. The <br />proposed density does not appear to be appropriate for an R -1 District. The Low <br />Density Residential land use classification allows up to 4 units per acre, and most R -1 <br />zoned plats are hard - pressed to exceed 2.5 units per acre. The proposed small lot, <br />high density development would likely require an R -2, Medium Density Residential <br />District, which allows up to eight units per acre. The proposal, being surrounded by R -1 <br />zoning and large single family parcels does not appear to maintain a compatible land <br />use pattern with the surrounding area. <br />3 <br />Required <br />Proposed <br />Lot Area <br />10,000 square feet <br />5,460 square feet <br />Lot Width <br />75 feet <br />52 feet <br />Front Yard Setback <br />30 feet <br />-13 feet <br />Side Yard Setback <br />7.5 feet <br />- 4 feet <br />Rear Yard Setback <br />30 feet <br />- 38 feet <br />While some degree of flexibility to the standards of the zoning ordinance may be <br />allowed through PUD, the requested variances are quite significant. The lot area <br />proposed is nearly half of what is required for the R -1 District. The narrow lot width <br />appears to create very tight conditions, with homes roughly eight feet apart. A <br />significant front yard setback reduction is also requested, further intensifying the tight <br />setting. <br />Staff recommends that the applicant remove a number of units throughout the <br />development to create larger lots with more conforming setbacks. Specifically, staff <br />recommends that units be removed adjacent to the steep slope and in areas containing <br />dense tree cover. <br />Density. The proposed density for the site is approximately 6.08 units per acre. The <br />proposed density does not appear to be appropriate for an R -1 District. The Low <br />Density Residential land use classification allows up to 4 units per acre, and most R -1 <br />zoned plats are hard - pressed to exceed 2.5 units per acre. The proposed small lot, <br />high density development would likely require an R -2, Medium Density Residential <br />District, which allows up to eight units per acre. The proposal, being surrounded by R -1 <br />zoning and large single family parcels does not appear to maintain a compatible land <br />use pattern with the surrounding area. <br />3 <br />