My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-10-2006 Additions
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
05-10-2006 Additions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2012 2:23:12 PM
Creation date
3/28/2012 2:22:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WHEREAS, HR 5252 and S 2686 would threaten the ability of the City to <br />manage its public rights -of -way by allowing video service providers with a <br />national license or new cable franchise to appeal the City's regulations to the <br />Federal Communications Commission; and <br />WHEREAS, local cable franchising allows for cities and towns around the country <br />to exercise local authority, decision- making and consumer protection, to establish <br />and support commercial -free community television, and to receive franchise fees <br />that private companies pay as compensation for their use of local public rights -of- <br />way; and <br />WHEREAS, the City objects to legislation that creates a subsidy to the <br />telecommunications industry at the expense of the City's taxpayers; <br />Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved by The City Council of The City of <br />That the City is opposed to federal legislation that: <br />1. Pre -empts the local franchising process; <br />2. Limits the City's ability to negotiate local franchises that enable the <br />community to obtain commitments to meet the cable - related needs <br />and interests of the community, <br />3. Voids existing cable franchises; <br />4. Limits or preempts the City's ability to require any entity that is <br />issued a video provider franchise to fully build out a franchise area <br />such that said services are equally available to all residents in the <br />franchise area; and <br />5. Limits or preempts the ability of the City to manage its public rights - <br />of -way in the best interest of its corporate and individual residents. <br />That the City, for the reasons stated above, urges the Minnesota Congressional <br />Delegation and all other members of Congress to oppose HR 5252 and S 2686 <br />and any other bills promoting national franchising and preferential treatment of <br />providers of cable and video services entering the market and to support <br />legislation that encourages fair competition to all areas of the City and that does <br />not reduce the compensation paid by franchised cable operators, including the <br />funding of public, educational and governmental access television. <br />Be It Further Resolved that the City Council directs that this Resolution be <br />forwarded immediately to the members of the Minnesota Congressional <br />Delegation, State Legislators and other members of Congress and House of <br />Representatives as deemed appropriate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.