Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> <br />Commissioners also discussed practical cases, such as family occupancy or temporary relocations, <br />where an owner-occupancy rule would create unintended barriers. <br /> <br />2. Detached Accessory Buildings. <br />The Commission directed staff to maintain existing limits in the R-1 District of up to three detached <br />accessory buildings with a combined maximum area of 1,500 square feet, while clarifying that attached <br />garages no longer count toward this total. <br />For multifamily and Common Interest Community (CIC) properties, Commissioners supported <br />removing rigid numerical limits and instead applying site plan review to any proposed accessory <br />structures to support reinvestment and replacement of older, non-conforming garages. <br />For commercial and industrial properties, the Commission recommended aligning with peer <br />communities by allowing one detached accessory building, not exceeding 30 percent of the principal <br />building’s size.. <br /> <br />3. Conditional Use Permits <br />The Commission also provided direction to Staff to create clear and consistent standards for accessory <br />structures requiring a Conditional Use Permit, focusing on measurable criteria such as building size, <br />location, and visual compatibility. <br /> <br />Summary/Staff Analysis <br />Staff find that the proposed amendments meet all three criteria for zoning text amendments outlined in Chapter <br />917 of the Zoning Ordinance. <br />1. Correction of Errors and Inconsistencies <br />The amendments correct internal inconsistencies and outdated language found throughout multiple <br />chapters of the zoning ordinance. Dimensional tables in Chapters 904–907 have been standardized, <br />definitions in Chapter 919 have been expanded, and contradictory setback language has been resolved. <br />Together, these changes improve usability for staff, applicants, and property owners. <br /> <br />2. Response to Changing Conditions and Trends <br />The amendments address evolving residential and commercial property needs. Consolidating accessory <br />structure standards under one section provides clarity for common homeowner projects, while the <br />introduction of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) reflects growing community and regional interest in <br />diversified housing options. Updated Conditional Use Permit criteria and modernized exterior material <br />standards also respond to current development practices and design expectations. <br /> <br />3. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan <br />The proposal aligns with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan related to maintaining high- <br />quality neighborhoods, supporting housing variety, and ensuring that zoning regulations are clear and <br />equitable. The amendments strengthen neighborhood compatibility standards while allowing modest <br />flexibility for property improvements and small-scale housing opportunities. <br /> <br />Overall, the proposed ordinance updates bring greater clarity, consistency, and flexibility to the zoning code and <br />represent the continued zoning modernization effort envisioned in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan’s Land Use <br />Chapter. <br /> <br /> <br />