My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-27-2005 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
04-27-2005 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2012 11:13:17 AM
Creation date
4/13/2012 11:08:57 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MARCH 23, 2005 <br />PARKING <br />REGULATIONS <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Montour. <br />Ayes (5) LaValle, Montour, Blesener, Allan, Keis <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />Blesener reported that he reviewed the listing ofsstreets outlined in the <br />former Public Works Director's memo dated July 21, 2000 relative to the <br />posting of these streets as 00 parking. In reviewing that listing, Blesener <br />felt that consideration should be given to changing the parking restrictions <br />on the Following streets to only one side: <br />Arcade Sheet (County Road D to Keller Parkway) <br />McMeneniy Street (Little Canada Road to Viking Drive) <br />Viking Drive (MeMenemy Roacl to Edgerton Street) <br />County Road B -2 (Edgerton Street to Arcade Street) <br />Blesener further indicated that his feeling is that traffic safety should be <br />the criteria used for slaking a decision on whether or not to post parking <br />restrictions on a street, not because the street has been designated as part <br />of the City's trail system. <br />LaValle noted that there will be increased traffic on the City's streets as <br />the result of the Unweave the Weave project. The Administrator felt that <br />project will result in a dramatic increase in traffic 00 City streets. <br />Allan agreed that only one side orMclMenemv Road and Viking Drive <br />needed to be posted as 00 parking. She suggested that the vvest side of <br />McMenenly Road be posted no parking and the south side of Viking Drive <br />be posted as no parkins. <br />Blesener felt there was the need to posy the east side of \IeMenenly Road <br />in the area of Sextant as no parking to ensure adequate traffic visibility. <br />Keis asked if Blesener felt there would be a lot of on-street parking on <br />these streets. Blesener did not feel there would be, but again stated that <br />whether or not to post streets as no parking should be done from a traffic <br />safety standpoint and not li'onl a trail standpoint. <br />I_jValle felt that anv streets that will be iinpacted ftonl the increased <br />tl CfIC h "(lilt LnVAeaA'e the \Veave sliotlld remain posted as no parkiilg Until <br />the conmleti0l1 ,)I' drat project. <br />-AI IlII ',Uiiueste(l gellinu :Ile inntut ll'OI i file harks cl. Recreation <br />(Co nil l ssion :lid the SI rill -; Department on this issue. Blesener that he <br />buoys the 0 i Its LC Rc' cation ' Oii1illl»ii)n ' VIII recommend iettiiiiiie4 the <br />nu ,' ;r10 .. 'IY,'.tk -c Il ``.!le C U'. ' nl5 St•e'ei l 0I1- sIrCet lr :1i;k. <br />- 6 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.