Laserfiche WebLink
.IIN1TS <br />CITY Cot NCIL, <br />MARCH 23, 2005 <br />The City .Administrator felt that County Road 13 should remain posted as <br />no parking. given the additional traffic that will utilize that street due to the <br />Lnweave the \Veave project as well as fact that this street is heavily used <br />by walkers, runners, and bikers as a route around the lake. The City <br />Administrator suggested that he would have the Sherilis Department and <br />the City Engineer look at these streets and make a recommendation. <br />Montour noted that the City has been surveying residents for their opinion <br />when it has considered posting* streets as no parkin.. The City <br />Administrator reported that resident surveys have been done in response to <br />specific requests for parking restrictions. <br />LaValle asked what prompted 13leseners interest m reconsidering the <br />parking regulations being discussed. t3lesener reported that he has had <br />lour or five complaints abort the restrictions. He noted that from the <br />survey information included in the packets, adjacent cities do not use the <br />designation of an on street trail as criteria for posting a street as no <br />parking. 131esener felt that there may be a need for no parking on one side <br />of the street, but not both. <br />Montour felt that pedestrian safety should be a consideration. <br />Mr. 131esener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2005-3-72 — DIRECTING CITY STAFF TO PUT <br />TOGETHER . -1 RECOilI3 IEA D. 1 TIOrA` ON THE LSS'UE OF PARKING <br />REGULATIONS FOR THE FOLLOGVRNGSTREETV• <br />Arcade .Street (County Road D to Keller Parkway) <br />llc,l'enemy .Street (Little Canada Road to Viking g Drive) <br />Viking Drive (!llcJlenenrn Road to Edgerton Street) <br />County Road 8-2 (Edgerton Street to .- Ircude Street) <br />The Foregoing resolution vvas duly seconcfed by :Allan. <br />Ayes (3) 13lesener..AAllan, Keis. <br />Nays ( ) ,Montour, LaValle. Resolution declared adopted. <br />Montour felt that whether or not to post a street as no parkin, v vas not a <br />naflic safety issue. bur rather a pedestrian salety issue. ,Montour felt that <br />if one sick of :he street is :_roinu ,o be posted as no pail :ing, property <br />owners :bong the street should ha%e inutit. <br />13lese.ner pointed out !hat ;he City ;lots not build mars :for people to wall; <br />on. Hut rather H. people to drive on. ,Montour indicated ;hat al some :rases <br />7 <br />