Laserfiche WebLink
3. us to grant a variance to exceed the 150 height limitation) due to interference with the <br />existing users. I asked her to document that. Her letter of July 8th circumvents that <br />request by using the RF maps to indicated there is still a "hole" in their coverage by <br />co- locating on that tower which renders the other considerations moot. <br />4. A new site plan with landscaping has been proposed with less planting that the initial <br />one submitted by Mark Holm. Staff would recommend we see screening similar to <br />the earlier submittal with a hardier evergreen than arborvitaes and with a height of at <br />least six feet as indicated on the new plan. <br />We have until the 27th of July to act on this matter if the Council wants additional <br />information. You could also consider conditional approval if you are comfortable with the <br />answers you have received to date and if you want any further concerns addressed. <br />cc: Steve Grittman, City Planner <br />Debra Weiss, Eagle Peak Consulting <br />Mark Holm, Cingular Wireless <br />