My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-13-2005 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
07-13-2005 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2012 2:12:16 PM
Creation date
4/18/2012 2:07:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'+ v 2V14 14(y <br />515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 55117 -1600 <br />(651) 766 -4029 / FAX: (651) 766 -4048 <br />w,vw. ci.little- canada. mn. us <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Mayor Blesener and Members of the City Council <br />FROM: Joel Hanson, City Administrator <br />DATE: May 20, 2005 <br />RE: New Cingular CUP for Wireless Communications Tower <br />MAYOR <br />Bill Blesener <br />COUNCIL <br />Jim LaValle <br />Rick Montour <br />Barbara Allan <br />John Keis <br />ADMINISTRATOR <br />Joel R. Hanson <br />This past week, I received a call from Mr. Desmond Chan representing Cingular Wireless. <br />Mr. Chan informed me that with the merger of AT &T and Cingular, there is some redundancy <br />in antenna locations. Therefore, they are looking at terminating existing leases if they cannot <br />secure more favorable lease terms. In our case, this impacts the tease we had with AT &T for <br />the water tower. Annual revenues are currently about $18,000 per year with a four percent <br />annual escalator. (See Articles attached that speak to this topic.) <br />While the above situation does not have a direct bearing on the new tower proposed to be <br />located at 3250 Spruce Street, it seems ironic that in one part of the City they are talking about <br />reducing the number of towers while needed to expand them in another. Therefore, 1 believe <br />we should proceed with caution in approving this CUP to ensure that there is truly a need for <br />a new tower and this is not simply a new tower to replace one that will not renegotiate <br />existing lease terms. <br />Another interesting point we should pursue is the existing tower at Donovan Construction. <br />Mr. Holm indicates it is outside of the 'A mile radius search ring as evidenced by his map. <br />Closer evaluation of the map indicates that the location of this tower seems to be <br />misrepresented in that it is not as far south of the search ring as the map indicates. Also, <br />given the elevation differences between this site and the proposed site on Spruce Street, it <br />may be a feasible option. <br />Still another point to keep in mind is American Tower Corporation appears to have a financial <br />interest in securing a new tower location. Based on Mr. Holm's letter of April 11, he <br />indicates they are "the leading independent owner and operator of wireless communication <br />towers in the United States ". We should ensure that we are obtaining objective information. <br />as it may not he in American Tower's best interests to co- locate the antennae on another <br />tower. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.