My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-28-2005 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
09-28-2005 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2012 2:25:53 PM
Creation date
4/23/2012 2:13:44 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Honorable Chairman and Planning Commission <br />October 4, 2002 <br />Page Two <br />u ;o is 8111 f d' <br />i Site Plan: <br />cc <br />1. The numbering of Lots 1 & 2 in Block 2 are reversed on the preliminary plat when <br />compared to the site plan. <br />Grading, Drainage, & Erosion Control Plan: <br />,0 1. No grading information is shown for Preserve Court from McMenemy Street to <br />approximately 115 feet east of McMenemy Street. The grading plan should address this <br />r y�,� area. <br />x.r } s >2. The access roads for maintenance of the proposed storm water ponds should be shown <br />Ir' r �,.� and addressed on the grading plan. All storm sewer structures and pipe should also be <br />t‘ S` shown on the grading plan. <br />�0 3. Spot elevations should be shown at all street intersection radius points to determine <br />drainage patterns around street corners. <br />o s-' A,� 4. Emergency overflows and elevations should be shown for all low points and ponds. The <br />• ,a•- elevation of the wetland should also be noted on the plan. <br />tics 5. The 100 -yr high water level should be indicated for each storm water pond. <br />ry 6. Boulevard grades appear to be as steep as 1:1 (H:V) starting directly behind the curb. A <br />5 -foot boulevard should be graded behind the curb at 2% and we suggest that after the <br />5 -foot boulevard a maximum of a 3:1 slope be used to allow for maintenance of the <br />areas. <br />7. The current grading plan shows only 3 lots with building areas higher than the elevation <br />/ of the street. Of these 3 lots, one is in excess of 8 feet higher than the street. All <br />0-tirt remaining lots have building areas lower than the street and the grade difference across <br />� , �' the buildable area of some lots is 18 feet. These factors will make it difficult to construct <br />G� a house on these lots without impacting the drainage to adjacent lots. Therefore we are <br />requiring that the grading plan show the first floor elevation and garage floor elevation of <br />every lot. In addition, the grading plan will need to address the grading of each <br />7) individual lot to demonstrate that the stormwater runoff from every lot can be conveyed <br />l�� L- within each lot and its surrounding drainage and utility easements without affecting the <br />0 adjacent lots. <br />J ptt- 8. The street grade on Perserve Court directly east of Preserve Trail is at 10 %. It would be <br />to beneficial to lessen this grade especially since it is sloping toward the dead end cul -de- <br />sac. However, site limitations may make this impossible. <br />Utility Plan: <br />AIL 1. No HDPE storm sewer pipe will be allowed under the street, however it may be used <br />behind the curb. <br />2. The watermain is shown directly under the storm sewer mainline. Either the storm <br />sewer or watermain should be moved to allow repair of the watermain without impacting <br />the storm sewer. <br />Lir 10 -04 -02 PingCom.doc <br />-28- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.