My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-28-2004 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
04-28-2004 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2012 2:50:44 PM
Creation date
4/25/2012 2:43:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2-9,7,4 ceanada <br />515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 55117 -1600 <br />(651) 766 -4029 / FAX: (651) 766 -4048 <br />www.el. little- canada. mn. us <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Mayor Fahey & Members of the City Council <br />FROM: Joel Hanson, City Administrator <br />DATE: April 23, 2004 <br />RE: Implementation of Business Revolving Loan Fund Program <br />MAYOR <br />iVliehael L Fahey <br />COUNCIL <br />Jirn LaValle <br />Matt Anderson <br />Rick Montour <br />Bill Blesener <br />ADMINISTRATOR <br />Joel R. Hanson <br />Attached are the proposed, final documents for the Business Revolving Loan Fund (BRLF). I have made two <br />substantive changes. The first deals with the Council's direction to provide for "total discretion" in the approval <br />of loan applications. The impetus for this change was concern regarding an applicant obtaining a BRLF loan that <br />focuses on outstanding maintenance issues (roof for example) versus "curb appeal ". (This change is reflected in <br />the BRLF Plan document in item 3.E. and item 8.) The second deals with my realization that a landlord would <br />not have been eligible for these fimds as the document was originally written. I believe we have a number of <br />investment properties that could benefit from this program. I did not proposed any change to the loan maximums <br />for multiple tenant properties. (This change is reflected in the BRLF Plan document in item 3.A.) I also attached <br />Another issue I did not address is the possible need to target these loans. Specifically, are there properties we do <br />not want improved as they are likely to be redeveloped in the not too distant future? Given the status of our <br />redevelopment efforts, I do not know that this item should be a concern, especially with the provision we have <br />added to deal with "discretionary approval ". However, I wanted to raise it now in the event it causes any concern <br />for the City Council. <br />The level of funding is another item we need to make a decision on. I am proposing that we allocate $150,000 to <br />this endeavor. The source of these fimds will be the Development Fee that were paid by Presbyterian Homes for <br />the Mayfield. The initial fee has accrued interest and now totals over $150,000. We initially set the deposit aside <br />to offset our costs for the LGA/HACA penalty we were to face as part of the TIF program. However, the <br />legislature eliminated this provision as part of property tax reform and the remaining fimds are available for us to <br />use as we see fit. (I have a call in to Mary Ippel at Briggs & Morgan confirming this fact.) I'm including some of <br />the development agreement language that I believe bears out my recommendation. <br />Pending your approval, we will begin advertising the program and see what interest we can generate. US Bank is <br />interested in participating and has improved their small business lending programs that should give us a good fit. <br />I'm expecting their review of these guidelines by Wednesday's meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.