My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-28-2004 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
04-28-2004 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2012 2:50:44 PM
Creation date
4/25/2012 2:43:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />APRIL 8, 2004 <br />It was noted that Patrick Collova, adjacent property owner, has submitted <br />a letter expressing concern that his property will be landlocked by this <br />development. <br />Barraclough recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat for Collova <br />Estates subject to compliance with all conditions imposed by the City <br />Planner, City Engineer, and City Staff subject to resolution of the <br />landlocking issue raised by Patrick Collova, and further recommending <br />approval of the Rezoning from Single - Family Residential (R -1) to <br />Medium - Density Residential (.R -2) at the time of Final Plat approval. <br />Motion seconded by Knudsen. <br />Motion carried 6 — 0. <br />REZONE TO The City Planner indicated that the City's Booster Station property <br />PUBLIC — located on County Road B is zoned Single - Family Residential (R -1). <br />BOOSTER The proposal is to rezoning this property to Public (P) to bring the <br />STATION zoning into compliance with the actual use of the property. <br />PROPERTY <br />Keis recommended approval of the Rezoning of the City's Booster Station <br />property from Single - Family Residential (R -1) to Public (P). <br />Motion seconded by Rheaume. <br />Motion carried 6 — 0. <br />AMENDMENT The City Planner reviewed a proposed amendment to the Zoning Code <br />TO ZONING which clarifies the public uses in both the Planned Unit Development <br />CODE FOR (PUD) and Public (P) Zoning Districts. The Planner noted that the <br />PUD AND P existing language in the Public District is somewhat ambiguous, and the <br />DISTRICTS proposed amendment provides for a clearer interpretation. The <br />amendment also clarifies that public buildings are not allowed uses in the <br />Planned Unit Development District. <br />Duray recommended approval of the Ordinance amending Chapters 920 <br />and 915 of the Little Canada City Code, known as the Zoning Ordinance, <br />by providing for allowable public uses in the Public and Planned Unit <br />Development Zoning Districts. <br />Motion seconded by Weihe. <br />Motion carried 6 — O. <br />- 12- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.