My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-25-2004 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
08-25-2004 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2014 8:55:50 AM
Creation date
5/3/2012 2:37:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In total, the existing garage and proposed detached garage would comprise 1,500 <br />square feet of accessory storage space. <br />The need for the conditional use permit relates to the desired construction of a second <br />garage on the property. The fact that the proposed building is of a size which can <br />accommodate a motor vehicles distinguishes it from a storage shed (for which a CUP <br />would not be required). <br />Setbacks. As shown on the submitted site plan. The applicants are proposing to <br />construct the garage in the rear yard of their property. <br />According to the ordinance, accessory buildings may be no closer than 10 feet from a <br />side or rear lot line or within 30 feet of a public right -of -way. <br />To be noted is that a future public street is planned on the east side of the subject <br />property. With this in mind, the proposed garage should not be closer to the east <br />property line than the existing residence. This setback, as well as the 10 foot rear yard <br />setback, have been satisfied. <br />Access. The submitted site plan does not illustrate a driveway to the proposed <br />accessory building. <br />Considering that a public street is anticipated on the east side of the subject property at <br />some future point, it is recommended that the site plan be revised to illustrate both <br />interim and long term driveway locations. Such site plan modification will avoid <br />questions regarding the need to process a CUP amendment (to address the driveway <br />location issue) at some future point. <br />Building Materials. The applicant has not submitted any information regarding the <br />appearance of the proposed garage. <br />As a condition of CUP approval, the design of the garage should be similar to the <br />existing house, replicating some of its architectural details (i.e. roof pitch). <br />Additionally, the finish materials (i.e. roofing, siding, facia etc) and color of the garage <br />should match the principal building. <br />Building Height. According to the ordinance, the proposed accessory building may not <br />exceed 15 feet in height. As a condition of CUP approval, the proposed building must <br />meet this requirement. <br />Building Use. As previously indicated, it is the applicant's intent to use the proposed <br />building primarily for storage and associated restoration of their "classic" automobiles. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.