My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-13-2004 Additions
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
10-13-2004 Additions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2012 10:15:27 AM
Creation date
5/9/2012 10:14:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Joel Hanson <br />From: Ginger Glaser [gglaser @comcast.netj <br />Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 10:10 PM <br />To: *LC council <br />Cc: Joel Hanson <br />Subject: Watershed District Contract <br />Council Members, <br />I notice in the agenda for this week's meeting discussion of entering <br />into a contract with the Watershed District for the property across <br />from City Hall. Although I can't be at the meeting, I want to express <br />the concern of the Parks Commission that this seems to us to be <br />premature. <br />As you may recall, at the last Parks Commission meeting at which this <br />issue was discussed, the Commission tabled the issue, as we felt that <br />we needed to see the final plans for the building prior to making a <br />recommendation. Our concerns were that the size, style and lot usage <br />of the building fit in with the parks and trails elements that <br />surround it. <br />Particularly, we epressed concerns that too large of a building, or <br />one that places parking prominently near the street side or trail, <br />could detract from the aesthetics the Commission and Council have <br />worked for many years to create. <br />As of this date, the Parks Commission has not had a chance to see <br />these plans or make a recommendation. While we feel that the Water <br />District probably would make a good tenant of this site, we would <br />like for the process to move forward with making the plans available <br />to us so that we can give the council a formal recommendation, one <br />way or the other. Ideally, this process would occur prior to the City <br />entering into any type of purchase agreement for the site. <br />Thus, we respectfully submit that we think moving on a contract this <br />week would be premature. <br />Ginger Sackett Glaser <br />Parks & Recreation Commission Chair <br />1 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.