Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JANUARY 16, 2008 <br />The Engineer continued his report, reviewing the City's assessment policy <br />in detail. He noted that residential street reconstruction is assessed at 85% <br />of an 8"/3" urban section street. However, assessment costs are capped at <br />a maximum of $57.97 per front foot. Given the fact that most lots are of <br />similar size and frontage along Lakeside Court, the City is proposing a per <br />lot assessment for street costs at $7,023.91 per lot. Water main <br />improvements are assessed at 100% of the costs to the benefitted property <br />owners at a cap of $6,302.00 per lot. Based on cost estimates, however, <br />that assessment is may not reach the cap. The Engineer is estimating <br />water main at $6,272.73 per lot. The City Engineer noted the proposed <br />assessment roll for the project with total assessments for street and water <br />main estimated at $13,296.64 per lot. <br />He then reviewed the proposed project schedule as well as construction <br />issues that are typical of any project. <br />Dean Hedlund, 855 Keller Parkway, asked for an explanation of the - <br />frontage range of 75 feet to 125 feet that the City uses for assessing lots. <br />The City Engineer reported that typically street improvement costs are <br />assessed based on actual front footage, with the minimum front footage <br />amount at 75 feet and the maximum at 125 feet. The Engineer also <br />explained the odd-shape lot formula which comes into play for cul-de-sac <br />lots, etc. and is utilized to provide equity among property owners. He <br />noted that in the case of Lakeside Court, however, the City is utilizing an <br />equal per lot assessment for the road improvement. <br />Peter Ganzel, 2795 Lakeside Court, asked about the City's share of the <br />improvement costs. The City Engineer indicated that the assessment <br />policy allows the City to assess up to 85% of road improvement costs. He <br />also noted that in levying an assessment, the City must prove that the <br />amount of the assessment is equal to the benefits received by the property. <br />The Engineer stated that in order to ensure compliance with the benefits <br />received test, the City has put a cap on road improvement assessments at <br />$57.97 per front foot. In the case of the Lakeside Court road <br />reconstruction, the City would actually be assessing 36% of the project <br />costs with the City paying the remaining 64% of costs. Again, water main <br />is assessed at 100% of the cost up to a maximum of $6,302.00 per lot. <br />Keis noted that the assessments are estimates at this point. While it is <br />unlikely that the street assessment would go down given the City cap at <br />$57.97 per front foot, it is possible that the water main assessment could <br />be lower. In any event the assessment for the water main would not <br />exceed the cap of $6,302.00. <br />Ganzel asked when the decisions were made on the level of property <br />owner versus City cost participation. The City Administrator explained <br />