Laserfiche WebLink
-JuHTES, <br />City Council <br />'Th-O. 1C+e-,C <br />Edgerton <br />Drainade <br />2robleil <br />Anondo <br />Item Ho. 9 <br />Accessory <br />3uildinn <br />Set5ack <br />AnerWo <br />'ten So. 12 <br />?r. Taney reported that he has had conversatin with the City Engineer, <br />rublic 14orks and r. Lund, the property owne Involved, renal <br />drainane orohleJs en Edoerton. It has 'yen decided that the <br />dra vnl 1 he raised Four inches and the qa swaled and sodded. <br />The En neer reported that the drivew, will still Save the <br />drain as exists presently, but there All he a solid cover on it. <br />lilesener pot.' out that all thc,. andscapind will Save to he dome <br />in the ridht- f-way as 'Ir. Lund ....nill not let anyone on his property. <br />Fahey renorted t. t Lund's o eference would 5e to have the <br />at the south end o his pr .erty rather than in the wjddle <br />front yard, however, he ,rain was Placed at the low point <br />street. <br />drain <br />of the <br />in the <br />:hey Pointed o t that , e 01annind Comission San tabled <br />action on the set' uck for acc@,„sory 5uildinns pendinn further <br />inforxiation frox / the Council. <br />nr. el esener /:ported that he hrouhxt this issue up when sonleone <br />on Stark Sty' at wonted to build a na no and learned that it <br />had to he .thack 30 feet froui the rea property line. Under <br />L5 e old o dunce the sothack wonld have been 5 feet Ho n the <br />rear pr ertv line. <br />illesener reported th t when the ordinance <br />was ale tided in 1935, this provision was lee out and he believes <br />the r uncil thouoht the rear yard sethack fe, accessory hulldinjs <br />uou1 (132 covered Oy the 10 foot set5ack provis'on. Aowev:?r, trlo <br />s3' ck ended up to he 32 feet. <br />o ?lanner anreed that the oTjssion was unihtentio .uas <br />lust an eversidlut. <br />Fahey requested that the Planner Ove the Planninh len a <br />wemo axelaininn the situation. <br />2o01 si cle <br />Anenda <br />Ad di ti on <br />Hr. Anderson, owner of Poolside, appeared. before Ule Council and <br />reported that he just learned. that his neinhbors have concerns <br />reoardind the Poolside property. <br />Eohey inforeled Anderson that the neiohhors are concerned ahont <br />the axiount of traffic on Jackson Street frosi the Poolside <br />husiness, includino truck and sehri traffic. <br />Scalzo pointed out that Janson Street is not a C,.-ton road and:, <br />therefore, should not have sexri traffic on it. <br />P,ndersen reported that scads have always used Jackson for faakino <br />deliveries and there have been no c000laints in the past. Anderson <br />felt the neinhbors were cphiplaining due to on access he closed off <br />through his property to County Thad C. <br />7me <br />