My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-14-2002 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
08-14-2002 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2014 2:15:24 PM
Creation date
5/14/2012 9:48:14 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
N[INUTE5 <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JULY 24, 2002 <br />elimination or an existing fence on their property. The resident indicated <br />that the neighbors would prefer the fence remain For screening purposes. <br />Anderson reported that he did not object to the fence remaining. <br />The City Planner indicated that in reviewing the Poolside site plan, it <br />appears unlikely that a semi could get in and out of the property without <br />backing onto County Road C if the Jackson Street access is eliminated. <br />Scalze asked if a semi could maneuver on the site as it exists now if the <br />Jackson Street access is eliminated. The City Planner indicated that <br />without the addition, it may be possible to make improvements to the site <br />so that semis could circulate in and out without backing onto County Road <br />C. <br />A resident pointed out that the plan shows two access points onto Jackson <br />Street. Anderson noted that the addition of a second access to Jackson <br />Street was for convenience only, and he indicated that the site would work <br />with the existing access onto Jackson. <br />A resident brought up the designation of Jackson Street as a three -ton road <br />and asked why semis are being allowed to access that road. It was pointed <br />out that the three -ton designation is for posting purposes to protect the <br />road during the spring thaw. Other than that period of time, roads are <br />open to all traffic. <br />Scalze pointed out that the 1984 minutes are clear that Jackson Street was <br />not to be used as an access for Poolside. <br />Fahey noted that the reality is that this restriction has not been enforced <br />over the years. The question now is what is practical for both the <br />neighbors and Poolside. Fahey suggested that City staff should take a <br />look at the Poolside site and the feasibility of eliminating the Jackson <br />Street access point, and come back with a recommendation for the <br />Council. <br />Anderson indicated that if the Jackson Street access is eliminated, the <br />reality is that he will either have to continue doing business as he has been <br />or he will have to relocate his business. <br />Fahey pointed out that the trespass of semi trucks onto private property is <br />not acceptable. <br />Scalze asked why Jackson Street is a three -ton street versus nine -ton. The <br />City Administrator pointed out that Jackson Street has not been <br />I2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.