08-28-2002 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 11, 2002 ARCHITEC- TURAL REVIEW — POOLSIDE mastraluSe Trossen pointed out the City Engineers comment relative to the fact that parking stalls are shown at IS feet in length while the City's ordinance requires 20 feet. The City Planner and Trossen discussed the ordinance requirements with regard to drive isle and parking stall widths as well as turning radius. The Planner indicated that this property is zoned PUD, therefore, there is the opportunity for some flexibility with regard to parkin <a stall length_ The City Planner suggested that he discuss this issue with Steve Grittman, and will be prepared to respond to the property owner prior to the City Council meeting. M. Keis recommended approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat for Tacheny Addition subject to compliance with the recommendations of the City Planner as outlined in his report dated April 9, 2002, subject to compliance with the recommendations of the City Engineer, instructing the applicant to work with the City Planner on the issue of parking stall length and to verify with the City Engineer the width of the sidewalk easement along Rice Street. Motion seconded by Knudsen. Motion carried 6 — 0. Duane Stroman, Stroman Construction, presented the plans for an addition to the Poolside facility at 121 East County Road C. Stroman reported that the building plans meet all City Code requirements. Keis noted the issues raised relative to access to Jackson Street. Stroman indicated they were requesting two accesses to Jackson Street to aid in the circulation in and out of the site. He noted the plan calls for one -way traffic through the parking lot. Without the second access a turn - around area will have to be provided. However, ifthe second access is an issue, Stroman reported that it could be eliminated. Knudsen pointed out the recommendation of the Planner for the addition of cornice treatments along the roolline. Stroman indicated that they could loot: at adding cornice treatments. Keis explained the purpose of the architectural review and the City's desire to make development in the commercial areas aesthetically pleasing. Stroman indicated that Poolside was willing to comply with the recommendations raised by the City Planner.