Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JANUARY 30, 2008 <br />Blesener asked the amount of outdoor storage area the Council was <br />comfortable with. McGraw replied that he had no problem picking a <br />number, stating that his concern was how outdoor storage is defined and <br />what would be allowed. McGraw also felt that property owners should be <br />given some flexibility with their outdoor storage. McGraw felt outdoor <br />storage must be an accessory use to the business and cannot be a principle <br />use. The Planner stated that the Code requires outdoor storage to be an <br />accessory use incidental to the principle use of the property. Outdoor <br />storage would only be allowed for tenants of the building. The Planner <br />suggested that the amount of outdoor storage would have to be <br />proportional to the amount of building space that a business occupies. <br />Blesener noted that the City's goal is to clean up Ryan Industrial Park, <br />getting outdoor storage orderly and eliminating the junk being stored in <br />the Park. <br />The Planner pointed out that one negative of allowing a lot of outdoor <br />storage is that property owners are not being encouraged to build <br />buildings. The more outdoor storage allowed the less incentive to build a <br />building. The Planner suggested that limiting the amount of outdoor <br />storage does not disallow the use of a property. The property owner <br />always has the option of constructing a building. <br />Allan was concerned that allowing 60% of a property in outdoor storage <br />will result in less buildings and more outdoor storage. Keis noted that <br />even though the figure might be 60% of the lot size, there would be no <br />outdoor storage allowed in the front of buildings and parking requirements <br />would still have to be met. Keis felt that the 60% would give property <br />owners the full use of their property behind their buildings. <br />McGraw asked if an additional property tax could be placed on property <br />with outdoor storage. The City Attorney replied that the County Assessor <br />determined property values based on building and property. Property <br />taxes are based on those values. <br />Blesener suggested that the property in Ryan Industrial Park is valuable <br />because it has outdoor storage. <br />Michael Mergens, attorney representing Valor Enterprises, agreed that <br />there is a tax base that comes from the fact that outdoor storage is allowed <br />in Ryan Industrial Park. He pointed out that this area has poor soils that <br />make it difficult to support various building types. Mergens contended <br />that to maintain the tax base in Ryan Industrial Park, the City must allow <br />outdoor storage. Mergens pointed out that without outdoor storage the <br />Valor property is worth substantially less. Mergens stated that outdoor <br />storage is what drives the values of the properties in Ryan Industrial Park, <br />12 <br />