Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JANUARY 30, 2008 <br />and agreed that the storage should be allowed as a percentage of the <br />property. <br />The City Administrator asked if Mergens felt the 60% figure was <br />reasonable. Mergens stated that without seeing the exact details, he could <br />not comment. He felt, however, that it was a good start. <br />Blesener pointed out that the City does not want Ryan Industrial Park to <br />be the place where everyone is storing theirjunk. He noted that there are <br />existing CUP's in the Park for outdoor storage, and the City would like to <br />see compliance with these CUP's. Blesener felt that outdoor storage with <br />reasonable restrictions was the best way to maintain property values in the <br />park. It was his feeling that tying outdoor storage to building size was not <br />reasonable given the varying types of businesses in the park and their <br />resulting outdoor storage needs. Blesener felt it more reasonable to tie <br />outdoor storage to the size of the property. He agreed with the <br />clarification of what types of storage would be allowed as outlined by the <br />Planner in his proposed ordinance draft. Blesener stated that outdoor <br />storage needs to be orderly, manageable, and accessible via fire lanes. <br />McGraw asked what would be a reasonable amount of time that something <br />could be stored on a property, specifically storage as relates to auto repair <br />businesses. Mergens suggested that the City could require aturn-over <br />time for storage items, and felt that was more reasonable than requiring <br />that an auto waiting to be repaired must be movable under its own power. <br />The City Administrator pointed out that the Valor property is almost two <br />acres in size and according to the City Engineer's calculation 91 % of the <br />lot had been utilized for outdoor storage. However, had they been in <br />compliance with their CUP, the 60% limitation would have been adequate. <br />Allan again noted that auto repair businesses are the biggest outdoor <br />storage problem for the City. Blesener again suggested a limitation on the <br />number of auto repair licenses. McGraw asked about the various types of <br />auto repair. The City Planner indicated that the Code defines minor as <br />well as major auto repair. Minor includes tire and battery stores. Major <br />includes major engine and body repair. McGraw suggested separate <br />license classes for major engine repair and body repair. McGraw felt there <br />was more of an outdoor storage issue with a major auto body repair <br />business than a major engine repair business. <br />The City Administrator stated that he would discuss this issue with the <br />Code Enforcement Officer to determine her experience in the level of <br />enforcement between these two classes of business. <br />13 <br />