My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-12-2002 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
06-12-2002 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2012 2:03:05 PM
Creation date
5/14/2012 1:53:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
calcareous fens, low prairies, lowland hardwood swamps, and seasonally flooded basins <br />are highly sensitive to degradation. Flood plain forests, reed canary grass meadows, <br />shallow (reed canary grass, cattail, giant reed or purple loosestrife) marshes are only <br />slightly sensitive to degradation. See the current version of the Minnesota Pollution <br />Control Agency's publication "Storm -Water and Wetlands: Planning and Evaluation <br />Guidelines for Addressing Potential Impacts of Urban Storm -Water and Snow -Melt Runoff <br />on Wetlands " for details.) <br />D.) The following storm water management practices must be investigated in developing <br />the storm water management part of the stoma water pollution control plan in the following <br />descending order of preference: <br />1.) Protect and preserve as much natural or vegetated area on the site as possible, <br />minimizing impervious surfaces, and directing runoff to vegetated areas rather than to <br />adjoining streets, storm sewers and ditches. <br />2.) Flow attenuation of treated storm water by the use of open vegetated swales and <br />natural depressions. <br />3.) Storm water wet detention facilities (including percolation facilities); and <br />4.) A combination of successive practices may be used to achieve the applicable <br />minimum control requirements specified in subsection (D) above. The applicant shall <br />provide justification for the method selected. <br />4.8 Minimum Design Standards for Storm Water Wet Detention Facilities. At a minimum <br />these facilities must conform to the most current technology as reflected in the current version <br />of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's publication, "Protecting Water Quality in Urban <br />Areas" and the current requirements found in the same agency's NPDES permits for storm <br />water associated with construction activities. <br />4.9 Minimum Protection for Natural Wetlands. <br />A.) Runoff must not be discharged directly into wetlands without appropriate quality (e.i., <br />treated) and quantity runoff control, depending on the individual wetland's vegetation <br />sensitivity. See the current version of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's <br />publication, "Storm -Water and Wetlands: Planning and Evaluation Guidelines for <br />Addressing Potential Impacts of Urban Storm -Water and Snow -Melt Runoff on Wetlands" <br />for guidance. (Commentary: The sensitivity of a wetland to degradation varies with <br />vegetation type. Sedge meadows, open bogs and swamps, coniferous bogs, calcareous <br />fens, low prairies, lowland hardwood swamps, and seasonally flooded basins are highly <br />sensitive to degradation, while flood plain forests, reed canary grass meadows, shallow <br />(reed canary grass, cattail, giant reed or purple loosestrife) marshes are only slightly <br />sensitive to degradation) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.