My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-27-2002 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
03-27-2002 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2012 2:53:08 PM
Creation date
5/14/2012 2:36:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Functional Analysis <br />March 21, 2002 <br />Page 6 <br />• Pooling. The boundaries of the TIF District control where the money can be spent. For a <br />redevelopment district, not more than 25% of the tax increment revenues can be spent on <br />activities outside of the district. This amount decreases to 20% for renovation /renewal <br />districts. In practical terms, the amount available for expenditure is less because <br />administrative expenses count as outside of district costs. (M.S. 469.1763, Subd. 2) <br />• 4 -Year Knockdown Rule. Since redevelopment projects evolve over a period of years, it <br />is important to be aware of the time constraints associated with a TIF district. Qualified <br />actions must occur for every parcel in the district within four years of the date of <br />certification by the County. Without a qualified action, the value of the parcel is removed <br />from the district. The City can request restoration of the parcel when action occurs. The <br />parcels values will be restored at the then current (presumably higher) values. Qualifying <br />actions include demolition, rehabilitation, or renovation of property, other site preparation <br />and the improvement of an adjacent street. The installation of utility service including <br />sewer or water systems are not qualified actions. (M.S. 469.176, Subd. 6) <br />• 5 -Year Rule. Another important time constraint affects the ability to spend tax increment <br />revenues. All commitments for tax increments must occur within five years of <br />certification. Eligible commitments include bonds and binding development agreements. <br />This limitation should not be a constraint if all revenues are used for up -front land <br />acquisition and infrastructure costs, The city will not be able to provide direct assistance <br />to specific development projects occurring outside of the five year window. (M.S. <br />469.1763, Subd. 3) <br />• Streetscape. Streetscape improvements located outside of the TIF district are limited in <br />the ability to be funded by TIP. Tax increments cannot be spent on improvement, <br />equipment or other items that are for decorative or aesthetic purposes. This limitation <br />also applies to functional improvements and equipment if the cost is increased by more <br />than 100% as a result of the selection of materials, design, or type as compared with more <br />commonly used materials, designs, or types for similar improvements, equipment or <br />items. (M.S. 469.176, Subd. 4g) <br />• Implementing Authority. One of challenges in implementing the Rice Street Crossing <br />Plan is that the area spans three municipalities. The municipal boundaries may not limit <br />the boundaries of a TIP district. We believe that the County HRA could serve as the <br />"authority" for a TIF district made up of parcels in more than one municipality. Each <br />municipality would need to take separate action to approve the district. <br />• Base Value. In estimating the amount of tax increment revenue from redevelopment, it is <br />essential to account for the loss of value through demolition. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.