My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-27-2002 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
03-27-2002 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2012 2:53:08 PM
Creation date
5/14/2012 2:36:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Functional Analysis <br />March 2l, 2002 <br />Page 11 <br />• The County will not leave the Public Works site until 2005. If initial redevelopment <br />occurs in 2006, tax increment or abate revenues will not be available until 2008. <br />• The establishment of a TIF district is a balancing act. Current laws encourage delaying <br />the start of the five -year window for obligating TIF revenues until the point of <br />redevelopment. Although positive changes in the TIF Act are possible, this approach <br />assumes some risk because the State may change the Act in ways that limit applications <br />for Rice Street Crossings. The challenges in using TIF in this area are present in many <br />other settings across the State. A real commitment to Livable Communities and Smart <br />Growth initiatives will require new or expanded finance tools for local governments. <br />Funding Capacity <br />The table in Attachment A contains a preliminary analysis of the local funding capacity for Rice <br />Street Crossings. This analysis is intended solely to provide an initial indication of the funding <br />capacity created by the Use of TIF and tax abatement. <br />Based on the assumed project size and valuation, the Preferred Concept provides a funding <br />capacity of $8.4 million to $11.7 million. Several variable influence the results of this analysis: <br />• The analysis uses tax capacity formulas and tax rates for taxes payable 2002. Recent <br />history shows the challenges of forecasting the future elements of the property tax <br />system. <br />• The base value of TIF districts is a simple estimate based on existing values. The <br />reconfiguration of parcels, the classification of redevelopment property and the values <br />assigned to County parcels will shape the actual base values and the impacts on funding <br />capacity. <br />• The analysis assumes that all tax increment and abatement revenues are pledged to debt <br />incurred to finance project costs. <br />• No finance costs or capitalized interest are accounted for in this analysis. These expenses <br />count as supportable costs and reduce monies available for project costs. <br />• The economics at the time of redevelopment will influence the actual value resulting <br />from redevelopment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.