Laserfiche WebLink
APR. 24. 2002 12 :51PM EHLERS & ASSOCIATES <br />NO. 9137 P. 2 <br />E H LE MEMORANDUM <br />& ASSeCIATES RS INC <br />DATE: April 23, 2002 <br />TO: Joel Hanson, City of Little Canada <br />FROM: Mark Ruff <br />RE; Common Bond Project <br />You have asked us to comment on the potential for the City to assist Common Bond with the remodeling <br />of its existing facility in conjunction with the construction of 35 new units of housing. The remodeling <br />costs could range from $100,000 to $200,000. <br />The City could create a new housing tax increment financing district with a maximum term of 26 years <br />and assist Common Bond with up -front dollars to complete the remodeling as long as the following <br />conditions were met: <br />I. The new units and the existing building both met the income restrictions for a housing <br />district, which are that at least 20% of the units be limited to incomes of 50% or less of <br />median or 40% of the units are income restricted to 60% of median income. <br />2. The developer demonstrates the need for the assistance through a project pro forma. <br />3. The City is comtortable that the project as a whole would not occur without the assistance. <br />Most attorneys are not concerned with meeting traditional "qualified costs" such as land acquisition, site <br />improvements, etc. with a housing district, given recent changes in legislation. <br />The schedule, assuming. no waivers of any deadlines were requested, could enable a district to be <br />established by June 26 ". Attached is a sample schedule. We would further recommend that this district <br />include, either how or at a later modification, the Sherman development to maximize use of increment <br />and reduce administrative costs. <br />Also attached is a projection which shows a very low tax estimate for the 35 units of only $460 per unit <br />and demonstrates that $125,000 could be repaid to the City, with 6% interest, over 15 years. We would <br />expect that the taxes would be higher than these estimates, but current tax treatment of affordable housing <br />is still in flux given property tax reform. <br />Please contact us with any further comments or questions. <br />- 1 7 - <br />