My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-24-2002 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
04-24-2002 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2012 8:18:43 AM
Creation date
5/15/2012 8:11:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
details are not provided, but the fence must be of a wood or masonry wall type of <br />construction, rather than galvanized chain link. The fence may be eight feet in height, <br />and may have barbed wire within the enclosure for security. <br />With regard to the surfacing, the applicant is seeking a variance to allow a Class V <br />gravel surface due to the nature of the equipment located in the storage area. <br />Variances are to be reviewed as to whether there is a unique physical hardship <br />restricts putting the property to reasonable use. In this case, the applicant suggests <br />that the hardship would be the nature of the equipment to be stored in the enclosure, <br />and the fact that asphalt surface would not hold up under those conditions. The <br />applicant has stated that they would enhance the landscaping around the enclosure in <br />an effort to minimize any visual impacts of the Class V surface. <br />However, the ordinance also lists concrete as an acceptable surface for outdoor <br />storage. The ordinance was developed with the intent that outdoor storage was a <br />disfavored use, and that where allowed, the standards for development and <br />maintenance of such areas would be high. It would seem to staff that a concrete <br />surface could be designed that would accommodate the pressure of the heavy <br />equipment proposed by the applicant, although it may be an expensive item. <br />Nonetheless, the ordinance specifically states that economic factors alone are not to be <br />used as the basis for the grant of a variance. Moreover, it would seem inconsistent <br />with the intent of the ordinance to grant a variance where the ordinance was designed <br />to discourage this type of unpaved storage use. <br />Staff does not recommend the variance. As noted in the paragraphs above, the <br />ordinance was drafted to allow outdoor storage only where it could be done without <br />concerns over size, materials, and ongoing maintenance. Although asphalt may not be <br />practical for the applicant's specific needs, concrete is also an acceptable material that <br />should be able to withstand the demands made by the applicant. If neither material is <br />acceptable, it is possible that the use is inappropriate for this zoning district. <br />Staff recommends the Conditional Use Permit for outdoor storage only with full <br />compliance with the ordinance standards as summarized above from the Industrial Park <br />District. <br />pc: Kathy Glanzer <br />Steve Westerhaus <br />Terry Maurer <br />Greg Schroeder <br />Hillcrest Development, 2424 Kennedy Street NE, Minneapolis, MN 55413 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.