My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-24-2002 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
04-24-2002 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2012 8:18:43 AM
Creation date
5/15/2012 8:11:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />DECENM.EI2 19, 2001 <br />CUP PLANNED Fahey y opened the Public Hearing <br />PUD as well as Concept and to review the Conditional Use Permit <br />DEVELOPNlEN "i'— allow the construction ptt,Stage an Development Stage > <br />ourteen (14) office/condominium unitstonrproperty <br />addition to retail shops on the no side <br />north of to e Canada Road has now side Little <br />Canada Road. The focus for <br />Administrator pointed out that an office concept primarily n met the requirements of <br />the Redevelopment Guide office. The <br />tRabutting because office space does not re <br />the street. Retail space wants par-king of the building. quire parking <br />p � that immediately accesses the <br />Scalze pointed out the recommendation of the Planning <br />dressing up both the north and south sides of the proposed agreed that a much � Commission for <br />Planner <br />better job could p °posed retail shops. The <br />building. Montour felt that the front could be done with the south side <br />indicated that lithe Council agrees dressed i of the <br />indicated <br />,gees that pas well. Montour w en <br />building and Rice Street, parking should be allowed <br />Montour stated that what the <br />1 other issue <br />nsso far sat will the building look the <br />agreed with the recommendation o look like. <br />individual storefronts and varying of the Planning acceptable to him. Montour <br />r'ooflines. Montour stated eon at e was <br />making <br />looking for a "main street" appearance. stated that he w <br />Fahey stated that the strip mall concept was objectionable to him. <br />suggested a freestanding store for Snyders without the attached strip mall. <br />Grootwassink felt this was a waste of land and was not sure it d work <br />economically. <br />would work <br />Fahey pointed out that this is the first time the City has reviewed this concept. <br />Re suggested that the front line parking was not a deal breaker', and the issue <br />was the type of building, <br />Knowlan asked what additional requirements are imposed in this area versus <br />he <br />indicated that more e Goodyear project was developed. The City indir brick is required in the redevelopment area. Pfanner <br />Jested that they try to rework the concept to see if the <br />something closer to what the City is looking . Fahey I <n that, if <br />necessary, for y can come up with <br />Y a workshop meeting can be called to review concepts that, if <br />developer. <br />pts with the <br />The City Administrator reported that this proposal was <br />Council as a concept given it is a major deviation from the Develo <br />Guide. The Administrator indicated that the City prkseatne to the <br />freestanding Snyders store in Little y w °uld like a new meat <br />a way to make the project work for Ca the and developer and that perhaps there is <br />both the developer and the City. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.