My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-27-2002 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
02-27-2002 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2014 1:54:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2012 2:37:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Sam Roberto <br />Project B B XX -01 -1 1 9A <br />May 24, 2001 <br />Page 4 <br />compacted. These things considered, consideration should be given to: (I) removing and <br />replacing both the existing fill and the peat with compacted backfill, (2) removing the existing <br />fill and peat to allow the proposed residence to be supported on the underlying alluvial and <br />glacial soils down approximately 10 feet, or (3) supporting the residence on piles driven through <br />the existing fill and peat, and into the underlying alluvial soils and glacial soils. <br />Given the depth of the existing fill and peat, it is our opinion that the most economical of the <br />three options provided above is to remove the existing fill and peat, and replace it with <br />compacted backfill. While it may be possible to incorporate a basement level into the proposed <br />residence and thereby limit the volume of replacement backfill required, the shallow <br />groundwater encountered will not likely allow a full basement to be constructed. <br />While the glacial soils present below the existing fill and peat appear capable of supporting <br />replacement backfill and the assumed building loads, the alluvial soils do not. Based on the <br />penetration resistance values recorded, we expect that alluvial soils exposed in excavations to <br />remove the existing fill and peat will be waterbearing and unstable. While it may be possible to <br />establish a stable platform atop the alluvial soils with a thick lift of coarse, free - draining sand, it <br />may ultimately be necessary to remove some or all of the alluvial soils (down to glacial soils) to <br />facilitate the placement and compaction of backfill. <br />C.4. Reusing On -Site 1Vlaterials <br />The swamp- deposited peat will not be suitable for reuse, and will have to be hauled from the site <br />unless there are landscaping applications for it. Portions of the existing fill may be suitable for <br />reuse, provided they are free of debris and organic material. Alluvial and glacial soils will <br />initially be difficult to reuse because they will be wet. While it may be possible to spread and <br />dry these soils prior to reusing them, it may be economically more practical to just haul them off <br />site and replace them with drier, imported soils. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.