My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-23-2003 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
07-23-2003 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2012 9:48:35 AM
Creation date
6/21/2012 9:29:23 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JULY 9, 2003 <br />The City Administrator indicated that any action this evening on the <br />revised PUD should be subject to satisfactory review of the City Planner <br />and City Engineer, subject to a screening plan for the canopy at the back <br />of the Council 82 site, subject to specific details relative to outdoor <br />storage, and subject to verification of the parking layout. The <br />Administrator noted that the City Planner is recommending that parking, <br />drives, and access areas be paved and curbed. The Administrator asked <br />for Council direction on that issue. <br />Fahey felt it did not make sense to pave the area where the future building <br />on Lot 3 is proposed to be located. <br />Johnson asked about landscaping and screening for Lot 3. The City <br />Administrator noted that the outdoor storage area would need to be <br />screened from view of the public right -of -way that includes Country Drive <br />and Spruce Street. <br />Fahey felt that relative to curbing and paving that the roadway for <br />circulation around the site should be paved and curbed. Johnson indicated <br />that it would be problematic to curb that road given it would restrict access <br />into the outdoor storage area. Fahey suggested that the road at least be <br />paved, and felt this would show Mr. Johnson's spirit of compromise. <br />Blesener felt that the Council and Mr. Johnson were close to an agreement <br />for the revised PUD, but noted that the second user of Lot 3 was likely not <br />feasible from the City's standpoint. <br />There was no one else from the general public present wishing to <br />comment on this matter. <br />Upon motion by LaValle, seconded by Blesener, the public hearing was <br />closed. <br />Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2003-7-147 — TABLING ACTION ON THE <br />REVISED PUD FOR DRYWALL SUPPLY PENDING REVIEW AND <br />COMMENT BY THE CITY PLANNER, CITY ENGINEER, AND CITY <br />STAFF ON THE REVISED PLAN PRESENTED THIS EVENING <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Blesener. <br />Ayes (4) LaValle, Blesener, Anderson, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />8 <br />- 1 5 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.