My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-11-2003 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
06-11-2003 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2014 2:44:21 PM
Creation date
6/21/2012 12:36:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fireworks fee cap provision <br />to become law <br />Anne Finn <br />A provision that caps the fees cities can impose on <br />vendors selling consumer fireworks is part of an omnibus <br />bill that will become law.The proposal began as a bill, <br />HF 800 (Hackbarth, R- Cedar), that was introduced in <br />response to what some called excessive fees adopted by a <br />few cities after last year's legalization of consumer fireworks. <br />Since last year, sparklers, party poppers, and snakes have <br />been legal in Minnesota. The bill was inserted into the <br />omnibus jobs and economic development finance bill <br />(HF 748). The provision caps the allowable fee at 6100 per <br />vendor selling from a permanent structure, and $350 per <br />vendor selling from a temporary structure. Presently, cities <br />charge between $0 and $1,100. <br />Cities maintain the fees are needed to cover the costs <br />associated with compliance checks, education, and <br />inspections relating to the sale of a regulated product. <br />The League testified that cities should retain the authority <br />to determine fees. <br />Proponents of the measure testified that current law <br />allows for too much variation between cities, and that <br />some cities are abusing their authority by using the fees as <br />a way to discourage retailers from selling fireworks. <br />The provision also would restrict cities from requiring <br />fireworks sellers to purchase additional liability insurance. <br />Testifiers stated that some cities have adopted Licensing <br />provisions that require liability coverage of$1 trillion. <br />The insurance requirements, coupled with the fees, make <br />selling fireworks cost prohibitive for retailers. <br />Additional language was added in the conference <br />committee relating to National Fire. Protection Association <br />(NFPA) standards. The clause states that cities cannot <br />prohibit or restrict the display of consumer fireworks that <br />comply with NFPA Standard 1124. This provision has <br />caused some confusion for cities because it raises the <br />question of whether cities can prohibit fireworks sales in <br />temporary structures. League counsel believes the provision <br />does not pre -empt a city's authority to ban transient <br />merchant sales, but it may force cities that allow transient <br />merchant sales to allow this form of fireworks retailing. <br />League staff is in the process of verifying the local impli- <br />cations of this language. <br />The bill is currently awaiting the governor's signature. <br />The fireworks provision will be effective immediately <br />upon enactment. Watch for more information in upcom- <br />ing issues of the Cities Bulletin. r <br />Transportation funding <br />package moving forward <br />Anne Finn <br />After weeks of negotiations, legislators have settled on <br />a transportation package that provides an infusion of <br />bonding dollars mostly for highways. The bill, HF 5 <br />(Kuisle, R- Rochester), authorizes the sale of $400 million <br />in trunk highway bonds and appropriates the money to <br />the Dept. ofTransportation (Mn /DOT) for trunk highway <br />improvements.The bill authorizes Mn /DOT to spend an <br />additional 8400 million in federal advance construction <br />funds for highways. <br />Key provisions of HF 5 also include: <br />• State triads to pay half the cost of operating the <br />Hiawatha light rail transit line (with the remainder <br />conning from the Hennepin County Regional Rail <br />Authority). <br />• Increases on various fees such as motor vehicle transfers, <br />license plates, and DWI- related driver's license reinstate- <br />ments. <br />• Authority for single - occupancy vehicles to use high - <br />occupancy vehicle lanes for a fee. <br />• A requirement that on -sale alcohol retailers that want to <br />remain open after 1 a.m. (under the provisions of the <br />new 2 a.m. bar - closing law) purchase a permit and <br />dedicate the revenue from the permit fee to a fund to <br />provide additional state troopers. <br />• A transfer of 2 percent of the motor vehicle sales tax <br />(MVST) revenues to a metropolitan area transit appro- <br />priation account, scheduled to begin in FY 2004. <br />Authority for Mn/DOT to spend up to $5 million <br />through FY 2008 in federal funds for greater Minnesota <br />transit capital assistance in addition to any other appro- <br />priations for this purpose. <br />The bill was released to the public late in the day <br />Tuesday, May 27,just a few moments in advance of the <br />House floor debate. League staff will be taking a closer <br />look at the 83 -page bill in the days ahead, and will <br />provide a rnore thorough description of the provisions in <br />the upcoming law summaries publication. <br />Notably absent in the bill is an increase in funding for <br />local roads.The Pawlenty Administration has indicated a <br />willingness to support more dollars for local roads in <br />future sessions. <br />In the meantime, the pending capital bonding bill <br />includes $20 million to fund the local road improvement <br />account. The account, if enacted, will provide grants to <br />assist local units of government with cost participation <br />responsibilities relating to trunk highway projects. r <br />May 28, 2003 Page 5 <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.