My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-24-2003 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
06-24-2003 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2012 12:49:46 PM
Creation date
6/21/2012 12:42:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JUNE 12, 2003 <br />Roycraft asked if Inman was aware of the costs for putting Allan Avenue <br />in and if he was willing to absorb the total cost. Inman replied that bids <br />have not yet been obtained for the improvement, but pointed out that it <br />will be less expensive to put the street in privately. Inman again expressed <br />concern that he was being required to dedicate 25 feet for the future <br />improvement of Leeward Way as it abuts the two lots he is proposing. <br />Inman questioned why the Lancette's are not being required to make the <br />same dedication. <br />Keis pointed out that while the Inman's are seeking a plat approval at this <br />time, the Lancette's are not. <br />The Inman's disputed the City Engineer's recommendation relative to a <br />cul -de -sac at the end of Allan Avenue, pointing out that a temporary cul- <br />de-sac was required for Leeward Way. The Inman's indicated that Allan <br />Avenue will connect to Leeward Way at the time that it is extended. The <br />Inman's again stated their opposition to dedicating 25 -feet of right -of -way <br />for the future extension of Leeward Way abutting the two proposed lots. <br />The Planner again explained the need to conform to the thoroughfare plan <br />for the area and that this subdivision presents the opportunity to acquire a <br />portion of the needed right-of-way for Leeward Way. No right -of -way is <br />being requested of the Lancette's at this time because they have not <br />requested a subdivision of their property. <br />Duray pointed out that platting the 25 feet as an outlot should address the <br />Inman's concerns as they would be able to retain title to the property until <br />Leeward Way is extended. <br />Inman again objected to dedication of the 25 feet pointing out that the <br />Lancette's are not being required to dedicate their half of the right -of -way. <br />Keis noted that the Lancette's are not requesting any platting or zoning <br />actions. Keis pointed out that Inman's are making a request; therefore, it <br />is the City's opportunity to obtain a portion of the Leeward Way right -of- <br />way. <br />Eric Weisman, Edgerton Street, took issue with the way that Little Canada <br />is being developed and urged the Commission to consider more <br />responsible development. Weisman noted that development can be either <br />regressive or progressive. 1 -Ie felt it very critical that trees be retained in <br />the City for both humans and wildlife. Weisman urged the Commission to <br />keep in mind the other creatures that live in Little Canada and to leave six <br />to eight trees on properties being developed. <br />7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.