Laserfiche WebLink
RR Tracks /South Owasso Area — (Exhibits 2 & 2A- Pages 9 -10) On the north end, we have a <br />dead -end right-of-way off of Woodlyn Avenue (Sandberg Road). On the south end, two <br />non - conforming uses existing due to inadequate frontage along a public street (167 & 53 <br />South Owasso). The sketch connects these two areas although it appears a building is <br />impacted. <br />The need for a formal thoroughfare plan appears questionable. This opinion is based on <br />the presumption that no expansions are possible on 53, 167 and 3088 without further <br />zoning approvals. This would seem to be the most cost - effective way to deal with this <br />issue. Furthermore, the southerly area may present a redevelopment option given the <br />nature of the existing structures. <br />Desoto /Allen /Edgerton /County Road D — (Exhibits 3 & 3A — Pages 11 -12) The vast majority of <br />this area is the Heinel property. The connection shown to Edgerton appears to occur at <br />3021. However, this parcel is occupied with a house and garage versus the vacant <br />condition depicted on the section map. <br />The need for a formal thoroughfare plan seems unwarranted here because it would require <br />the presumption of a specific development when many options exist. Desoto could be <br />improved to County Road D. Vanderbie could be extended further north. The sketch <br />depicts large residential lots that seem unlikely to occur. We should evaluate the <br />availability of the additional 16.5 feet from Slumberland to ensure the viability of Desoto. <br />We may have precluded that option when they expanded a few years ago. <br />Burke Lane/Yorkton Ridge /Condit — (Exhibits 4 & 4A — Pages 13 -14) Four property owners <br />make up this area with Sam Fasciana being the largest. This plan could address a number <br />of issues. They are: <br />• Existing dead -ends of Condit and Burke Lane where adequate right -of -way and <br />tum-arounds do not exist. <br />• Potential to vacate right -of -way along RR tracks along 2905 and the Southerly <br />portion of the Nadeau Road if the other proposed connections are made. <br />• Obtain additional Condit right -of -way north of Nadeau Road. <br />A formal thoroughfare plan may make sense here given the different property owners at <br />the north end of Burke Lane and the proposed connection to Condit. The proposed layout <br />seems to be the most efficient given the limited possibilities that exist. However, one <br />could also argue that any additional development would require further zoning reviews <br />giving us the opportunity to address this plan at that time. (My only concern here is the <br />two lots of record existing at the end of Burke Lane. They may be able to construct a <br />home without further approvals. This needs to be verified.) Another option may be to <br />hold a neighborhood meeting to see what the property owners may be thinking and to <br />make them aware of our ideas. <br />Maple Lane/Yorkton — (Exhibit 5 — Page 15) This area would connect Maple Lane to Yorkton <br />Boulevard to eliminate two dead -end situations. We chose not to connect these streets at <br />the time this development was approved due to concern about industrial traffic going <br />through the residential area. A letter of credit was also required to give us the ability to <br />make this connection if the need existed within the first three years of the development. <br />(See Exhibit 6 — Page 16) <br />-5 <br />