HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-28-2001 Council AgendaAGENDA
LITTLE CANADA CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2001
Call To Order — Regular Meeting — City Council — 7:30 p.m.
2. Roll Call
Mayor
Council Member
Council Member
Council Member
Council Member
City Administrator
City Attorney
City Planner
Cable TV Producer
Deputy Clerk
Mr. Michael I. Fahey
Mrs. Beverly Scalze
Mr. Jim LaValle
Mr. Matt Anderson
Mr. Rich Montour
Mr. Joel Hanson
Mr. Tom Sweeney
Mr. Steve Grittman
Mr. Todd Holdman
Mrs. Kathy Glanzer
Approval of the Minutes
February 14, 2001 Council Workshop Meeting
February 14, 2001 Regular Council Meeting
February 14, 2001 Council Workshop Meeting
Announcements
a. Presentation of Check — Bob Anderson and Rick Millette, Little Canada Historical
Society
* *This agenda is subject to change by additions and deletions. **
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 28, 2001
PUBLIC HEARINGS -
PUBLIC HEARING — Preliminary & Final Plat and Variance from cul -de -sac
length — Gilanderi Addition — Dick Kimmes
Correspondence Pages 1 through 11.
PUBLIC HEARING — Property Division to divide one lot into three as well as a
Variance from the City's limitation on cul -de -sac length — 3021 Arcade Street —
Thomas Theis
Correspondence Pages 12 through 24.
7. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING — Conditional Use Permit to allow
open and outdoor storage as well as a Variance for the amount of outdoor storage
— South Owasso Blvd. — Precision Tree
Correspondence Pages 25 through 34.
C. CONSENT AGENDA
Approval of Exemption from Gambling Permit — Former Queens of the St. Paul
Winter Carnival
Sheriff's Department background checks are satisfactory.
Correspondence Pages 35 through 38.
Approval of 2001 Program Fees
Corresondence Pages 39 and 40.
2
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 28, 2001
STAFF & CONSULTANT REPORTS
10. City Attorney
11. City Planner
12. City Administrator
a. Rice /Owasso Signal — New Bids
Correspondence Pages 41 and 42.
b. TIF Legislation Update
Correspondence Pages 43 through 52.
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
13. Economic Development
14. Public Safety /Gaming
15. Public Works
a. Purchase of Plow/Dump Truck
Correspondence Pages 53 through 55.
16. Building/Zoning /Code Enforcement
17. Parks & Recreation
18. Administration
19. Adjourn
CORRESPONDENCE
CITY OF LITTLE CANADA
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2001
PAGES CORRESPONDENCE
1 -11 Preliminary & Final Plat — Gilanderi Addition
12 -24 Property Division & Variance — 3021 Arcade Street
25 -34 CUP & Variance — South Owasso Blvd. — Precision Tree
35 -38 Exemption from Gambling Permit — Former Queens of the Winter
Carnival
39 -40 2001 Program Fees
41 -42 Rice /Owasso Blvd. Signal
43 -52 TIF Legislation Update
53 -55 Purchase ofPlow/Dump Truck
c e ? 9542. c?'emaek
MAYOR
Michael 1. Fahey
COUNCIL.
Beverly Scalze
Jim LaValle
Matt Anderson
Rick Montour
515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 55117 -1600 ADMINISTRATOR
(651) 766 -4029 / FAX: (651) 766 -4048 Joel R. Hanson
Email: cityhall @ci.little- canada.mn.us
CITY OF LITTLE CANADA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PRELIMINARY, FINAL PLAT & VARIANCE
PROPOSAL:
APPLICANT&
PROPERTY OWNER:
Request for re- approval of a Preliminary & Final Plat consisting of
four (4) single - family lots known as the Gilanderi Addition as well
as a Variance from cul -de -sac length. The property in question is
zoned Single - Family Residential (R -1).
Previous approval lapsed given that the Final Plat was not recorded
within six (6) months of approval.
Mr. Richard Kimmes
2429 Edgerton Street
Little Canada, MN 55117
PROPERTY
LOCATION: PIN No. 08- 29 -22 -41 -0060
Southwest Corner of County Road B -2 and Gilanderi Lane
Little Canada, MN 55117
PLANNING
COMMISSION: The Little Canada Planning Commission will be reviewing this
matter at their Thursday, February 15, 2001 meeting. The meeting
begins at 7:30 p.m. and will be held in the Council Chambers of
the City Center located at 515 Little Canada Road in said City.
CITY COUNCIL: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held by the
City Council on Wednesday, February 28, 2001 at 7:30 p.m., or as
soon thereafter as parties may be heard, in the Council Chambers
of the City Center located at 515 Little Canada Road in said City.
All persons with reference to this matter will be heard during the Planning Commission meeting
on Thursday, February 15, 2001 and the City Council meeting on Wednesday, February 28,
2001.
Sign language interpreters for hearing- impaired persons are available for public hearings upon
request. The request for this service must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call to
make the necessary arrangements.
Joel R. Hanson, City Administrator
Page 1
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH
MEMORANDUM
TO: Little Canada Mayor and City Council
Little Canada Planning Commission
FROM: Daniel Licht / Stephen Grittman
DATE: 4 November 1999
RE: Little Canada - Gilanderi Addition; Final Plat
FILE NO.: 765.09 - 99.32
Mr. Dick Kimmes has submitted a final plat for a four -lot single family residential
development along Gilander Lane, south of County Road B2. The preliminary plat for this
project was previously considered in late 1998 and early 1999. The design of the final plat
is generally consistent with that of the approved preliminary plat. The proposed lot range
in size from just more than 18,000 square feet up to more than 28,000 square feet. Right -
of -way has been provided for Gilander Lane where the existing loop driveway is to be
replaced with a 24 foot wide public street.
As a condition of the preliminary plat approval, the developer is required to provide the
necessary easements for a cul-de -sac at the south end of Gilander Lane. The easements
are necessary in order to provide for a turnaround should the existing loop road be
removed. The developer must provide documentation that all necessary easements have
been obtained, subject to review by City staff.
The only other outstanding issue with the proposed final plat is that the City Engineer
approve the drainage for the project. Therefore, our office would recommend approval of
the final plat subject to the following conditions:
1. Documentation of adequate easements for a cul -de -sac at the southern terminus
of Gilander Lane.
2. City Engineer of all grading, drainage and utility plans.
3. The driveway to County Road B2 for Lot 1 be located as far west as possible.
pc. Kathy Glanzer Greg Schmidt
Terry Maurer Greg Schroeder
Dick Kimmes
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK. MINNESOTA 554. 1 6
PHONE 612- 595 -9626 FAX E MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COG1
Page 2
NUV- 3 -dd WCV 16,10
Lit I lii" L: I I LG k., invn
ZZN '6Z1 '9 .33S 90 b/l 3S 3141 3* 0_334 00'9z9) scow 00'09
151/3 3k1 30 1234 00' tZ 1S3M 3141 40 ;Nil 1SV3
z
304 1S1 %3 rnOl3a A'ILHORS
38 i33hLS h VI VBa 0/
a ' 1 3 L3L'nO
? pnlao SHLLSIX3 aAOW38
O.
o z .h} L17, 61000
7 tz62Z 9.
crm
G —
el 1
O q
rn m a \N
>f. C O
0
\50C
-3/
t
-99 Od h fiN 3,.Z66Q06S
//
zza 16Z1 'B t3S 40
sao
Page 3
'SZ;)
1S _'A
c.
Q
d
GIL4NDE I
•
iig
- - n.. .....>,. --
1•
4f
i
•arP'gnl01.• •Z ✓u G bar ..
15
i?
1
st
El
a j,
r:
S.c:-
.---tf.5r2LtZTLL ifs
1 d.'i>
I "
' %itW'" . Dap:,
t
b I
it t-.. .
Cho
t. b\ ;11
4 At Yet . ;.
0/ «C
r
r..,„ . s 4 .411.n,.., ..
Page 4
Ramsey - Washington Metro
DATE: September 6.2000
APPLICANT: Richard Kimmes
District
Re: Gilan Deri Addition 00 -26
1902 East County Road 3
Maplewood, MN 55109.
(651) 704-2039
fax (651) 704 -2092
e -mail: rwmwd @mtn.org
Dear Applicant,
On June 7, 2000 Board of Managers of the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District
reviewed your application for the above- described project. A motion was duly made, seconded, and passed to
approve this project providing that the provisions of the permit were met.
Your revised plans have been reviewed and have been found to meet the provisions of the District Permit.
Please note general provision 14 which states:
"A representative of the grading contractor and the owner of the project must attend a meeting with the
Watershed District staff to review the erosion and sedimentation control plan and the requirements of the
Watershed District. This meeting shall be held prior to any grading of the site."
Please contact me at 651- 7042089 to schedule this meeting.
Sincerely,
Page
Karl Hammers
District Technician
Enclosure
cc: Brad Lindaman, Barr Engineering
Greg Schroeder, City of Little Canada
Page 5
(GENERAL PROVISIONS CONTINUED)
8. All soils tracked onto pavement shall be removed daily.
9. All construction site entrances shall be surfaced with crushed rock across the entire width of the entrance
and from the entrance to a point 50 feet into the construction zone.
10. All storm sewer catch basins not needed for site drainage during construction shall be covered to prevent
runoff from entering the storm sewer system. Catch basins necessary for site drainage during
construction shall be surrounded by silt fence or double ring of staked hay bales backed by snow fence. The
fence or bales shall be installed and maintained around all catch basins until the tributary areas are
restored.
11. Properly designed filter blanket and riprap shall be installed on the downstream side of all storm sewer
outlets.
12. All riprap shall be designed and installed with a filter material and meet the Minnesota Department of
Transportation specifications for riprap and filter material.
13. A silt fence backed by snow fence shall be installed and maintained directly downstream of all storm sewer
outlets.
14. A representative of the grading contractor and the owner of the project must attend a meeting with the
Watershed District staff to review the erosion and sedimentation control plan and the requirements of the
Watershed District. This meeting shall be held prior to any grading of the site.
15. All storm sewers discharging into wetlands or water bodies shall outlet at or below the normal water level
of the respective wetland or water body or at an elevation where the downstream slope is 1 percent or
flatter. The normal water level shall be the invert elevation of the outlet for the wetland or water body as
approved by the District.
16. Low floor elevations of homes or buildings adjacent to wetlands or water bodies shall be a minimum of two
(2) feet above the critical 100 year flood elevation for the respective wetland or water body as approved
by the District.
17. The toe of the silt fence shall be trenched in a minimum of 6 inches. The trench backfill shall be compacted
with a vibratory plate compactor.
8. Upon completion of the project and stabilization of all graded areas, all temporary erosion control facilities
(silt fences, hay bales, etc.) shall be removed from the site.
9. Establishment of vegetation on the site must be done according to the Ramsey County Erosion and Sediment
Control Handbook unless otherwise noted as a special provision of the permit.
-0. All permanent sedimentation basins must be restored to their design condition immediately following
stabilization of the site.
71. All plan revisions must be submitted to the District for review.
Special Provisions
(See Permit Attachment)
Authorized J. Aichinger Title:
District Administrator
-
Page 6
Date:
9/6/00
Howarc R. Green CoTpany
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
December 2, 1999
File: 803660J -0240
Ms. Kathy Glanzer
Deputy City Clerk
City of Little Canada
515 Little Canada Road East
Little Canada, MN 55117 -1633
RE: GILANDERI ADDITION
Dear Ms. Glanzer:
As requested, we have reviewed the final plat of the Gilanderi Addition and the variance request
for Lot 4, Block 1. The preliminary plat of Gilanderi Addition was approved by the City Council
on December 17, 1998. The major change to the plat since that time has been the addition of
more right -of -way in front of Lot 4, Block 1 in the event a cul -de -sac is ever needed in the future.
This was brought about by a comment letter from the Minnesota Department of Transportation
which indicated they could, at some time, widen TH 36 and eliminate the looped road which falls
within the TH 36 right -of -way. Although I believe the likelihood of this occurring in the future is
minimal, the Developer was asked to provide options for a cul -de -sac at the south end of
Gilanderi Lane should the need ever arise. The Developer prepared three options that were
reviewed by the City Planner, the Public Works Director, and myself. The option we chose
required some additional right -of -way be provided on Lot 4, Block 1. This is also the reason for
the variance request on Lot 4, Block 1. Because setbacks are measured from the property line.
this additional right -of -way moves the property line closer to the home pad, causing the need for
the variance. At the current time, the construction of Gilanderi Lane will not include this cul -de-
sac; therefore, the road will not be closer to the home site on Lot 4, Block 1. The road will only
become closer if MnDOT eliminates the looped road in the neighborhood causing a cul -de -sac
to be constructed.
We would recommend that the final plat and the variance request be approved. If you have any
questions regarding this information, please call.
Sincerely,
Howard R. Green Company
`/ te(. /GJ
Terry J. laurer, P.E.
TJM:tw
RECEIVED JEE, - 3 1999
O: \PROD \803660) \0240 \Itr 560.0201.dec99.doc
1326 Energy Park Drive • St. Paul, MN 551
Page 7
44 -9446 toll free 888/368 -4389
IVIE 1UTES
CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 15, 1999
pressure of a force main. Sewer would have to be extended down Ryan
Drive to service this property as well as the two others on the north side of
Ryan Drive.
Costanzo reported that he is hiring an attorney to look into this matter, and
requested a 30 -day delay on the CUP application. Costanzo reported that
he never granted an easement across his land, nor did Art Ryan with
whom he holds a contract - for -deed on this property.
The Zoning Administrator pointed out that the City is looking for the
paving of 24 required parking spaces. She noted that the applicant has the
ability to configure the parking spaces in any way that he wants so that
parking could be located away from utility lines. However, Mr. Costanzo
would like to blacktop the entire front of the property.
Morelan indicated that he is not sure of Mr. Costanzo's reasoning for
requesting the delay, however, he had no problem with granting a 30 -day
delay.
Mr. Morelan introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 99 -12 -254 — TABLING ACTION ON THE
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OPEN
AND OUTDOOR STORAGE OF MATERIALS AND EOUIPMENTAS
.4NACCESSORY USE AT 3151 COUNTRY DRIVE AS REQUESTED
BY MR CARL COSTANZO UNTIL THE JANUARY 26, 1999
COUNCIL MEETING SUBJECT TO MR. COSTANZO'S SIGNING A
WAIVER FORMALLY REOUESTING THE EXTENSION
The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Scalze.
Ayes (5) Morelan, Scalze, Pedersen, LaValle, Fahey.
Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted.
FINAL PLAT & Fahey opened the Public Hearing to consider the Final Plat for the
VARIANCE — Gilanderi Addition as well as a Variance for the front yard setback for
GILANDERI Lot 4, allowing a 25 -foot setback rather than the 30 feet required by
ADDITION Code. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the Final
Plat and Variance.
There was no one from the general public present wishing to comment on
this matter.
Upon motion by Fahey, seconded by Morelan, the public hearing was
closed.
Page 8
MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 15, 1999
The City Planner indicated that he concurred with the City Engineer's
recommendation for approval of the variance based on the same reasons as
outlined in the Engineer's report.
Morelan noted that the requirement that the developer provide
documentation of all necessary easements. The City Planner indicated
that he was concerned about the possible future construction of a cul -de-
sac at the end of the street. He noted that the developer is providing the
easement for the portion of the cul -de -sac on his property. Shoulder l
DOT cut off the loop portion of Viking Drive, it would be the
responsibility of MN DOT to negotiate with the property owners to obtain
the additional right -of -way for the cul -de -sac that would be required.
Morelan asked about enforcement of the Planner's recommendation that
the driveway for Lot 1 be located as far west as possible. The City
Administrator reported that the Building Official will enforce this
requirement at the time that a building permit is requested for the property.
Mr. Morelan introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-12-255 — APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT
FOR GIL4NDERI ADDITION AS WELL AS A VARIANCE
ALLOWING A 25 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR LOT 4 OF
THE PL-1T SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CITY ENGINEER, CITY
PLANNER, AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION
The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Scalze.
Ayes (5) Morelan, Scalze, Fahey, LaValle, Pedersen.
Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted.
REZONING— Fahey opened the Public Hearing to consider the rezoning of the
COUNTY Mueller property on County Road B from Business Warehousing (BW)
ROAD B — to General Business (B -3) in order that a retail sporting goods business
MUELLER can be developed on the property. The Planning Commission has
PROPERTY recommended approval of the rezoning.
There was no one present from the general public wishing to comment on
this matter.
Upon motion by Fahey, seconded by LaValle, the public hearing was
closed.
Page 9
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
PLANNING COMMISSION
LITTLE CANADA, MINNESOTA
FEBRUARY 15, 2001
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of Little Canada, Minnesota was held on the 15th day of
February, 2001 in the Council Chambers of the City Center located at 515
Little Canada Road in said City.
Chair John Keis called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and the
following members of the Planning Commission were present at roll call:
PLANNING COMMISSION: Mr. Scott Barraclough
Mr. Dennis Carson
Mr. Tom Duray
Mr. John Keis
Mr. Dan Knudsen
Mr. Thomas Roycraft
Mr. Tom Wojcik
ALSO PRESENT: Mr. Steve Grittman, City Planner
Ms. Kathy Glanzer, Deputy Clerk
WELCOME The Commission welcomed Tom Wojcik as its newest member.
TO NEW
MEMBER
ELECTION Carson nominated John Keis as Chairman of the Planning Commission.
OF OFFICERS The nomination was seconded by Duray. All were in favor.
Carson nominated Dan Knudsen as Vice Chairman of the Planning
Commission. The nomination was seconded by Duray. All were in favor.
MINUTES The minutes of the January 11, 2001 Planning Commission meeting were
approved as submitted.
GILANDERI Mr. Dick Kimmes appeared before the Commission requesting re-
ADDITION approval of the preliminary and final plat for the Gilanderi Addition as
well as a variance from the City's restriction on length of a cul -de -sac.
Kimmes reported that his approval for the final plat lapsed after six
months since he was unable to get the plat recorded. The fact that the plat
was not recorded was due to the fact that the County Recorder's office has
been unable to locate a document that deeded a portion of the original
Page 10
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 15, 2001
parcel of land for the Highway 36 right -of -way. Mr. Kimmes reported
that he is confident that this situation can be resolved within the next few
months.
Keis asked what has changed that makes Mr. Kimmes feel the matter can
be resolved.
Kimmes indicated that his surveyor had somewhat dropped the ball on this
issue and the plat spent some time sitting on someone's desk. Kimmes
reported that he is anxious to begin development this spring, and he has an
attorney, his surveyor, and the County working on resolving the issue.
Kimmes pointed out that no changes have been made to the plat from what
was approved previously.
Duray asked if the plat should be re- approved conditioned upon resolution
of the title issue. The City Planner indicated that such a condition would
not need to be placed on approval since this is an issue that will need to be
resolved at the County level prior to recording of the plat.
There was no one from the general public present wishing to comment on
this matter.
Knudsen recommended approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat for
Gilanderi Addition as well as approval of a Variance allowing a cul -de -sac
length in excess of 500 feet subject to compliance with all previous
conditions placed on the original approval.
Motion seconded by Carson.
Motion carried 7 — 0.
PROPERTY Mr. Tom Theis, 3036 Leeward Way, appeared before the Commission
DIVISION & requesting approval of the division of 3021 Arcade Street into three lots
VARIANCE — as well as a Variance from the City's restriction on cul -de -sac length.
3021 ARCADE Theis pointed out that he is proposing to extend the Leeward Way cul -de-
STREET — sac by 87 feet to provide street access for the two new lots. Theis noted
TOM THEIS that eventually Leeward Way will continue south with a connection
provided to Allen Avenue.
Theis reported that currently Leeward Way dead -ends without a cul -de -sac
at the end, and he is proposing the same for the 87 -foot extension of the
street. Theis felt it was impractical to put a cul -de -sac at the end of
Leeward Way at this point given the potential for the street to be extended
in the future, and given that the area that would be required for a cul -de-
Page 11
Little Canada, Minnesota
APPLICATION FORM
PAID S ,as-0
Rec. No
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit
Zoning District Amendment Variance 4'3S-C)
Text Amendment Subdivision 900
Other Planned Unit Development
Plan Review
Applicant G l 1 r. S E .
(Name)
C vner ,l� i K 4 /� 2 "/ :Pe ) Z.-CS
(Name)
(Address)
302 i A st.
(Address)
651 -y83 — SI I �
(Phone)
651-L191- E:7-CS
(Phone)
P--)perty Location (Street Address and Legal Description):
3o-, I Ar<<dz s� Jti1� C i111ti) (oei
N1 � u52_c\- 00 IT
C_scription and /or Reason for Request (Cite Ordinance Sections):
p i; C 2 1 +� � A e �-�e,�d �� e c\_)
0
b„: ,\
1t.LL,
k 0
Ir signing this application, I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the Zon-
ing and Subdivision Ordinances and current administrative procedures. I further acknowledge the fee explanation as outlined
it the application procedures and hereby agree to pay all statements received from the City pertaining to additional applica-
ti i expense.
Page 12
(Dianacure u. ,,N,,,,,.,,,.,, (Date_)
44a/ /4c4
MAYOR
Michael L Fahey
COLWC1L
Beverly Scalze
Jim LaValle
Mac Anderson
Rick Montour
515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada. MN 55117 -1600 AD1tI.VISTRATOR
(651) 766 -4029 / FAX: (651) 766 -4048 Joel R. Hanson
Email: cityhall @ci.little - canada.mn.us
CITY OF LIII LE CANADA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PROPERTY DIVISION AND VARIANCE
PROPOSAL:
APPLICANT:
Request for approval of a Property Division dividing one lot into
three as well as a Variance from the City's limitation on cul -de -sac
length. The property in question is zoned Single- Family
Residential (R -1).
Thomas E. Theis
3036 Leeward Way
Little Canada, MN 55109
PROPERTY OWNER: Mike and Kelly Pelzer
3021 Arcade Street
Little Canada, MN 55109
PROPERTY
LOCATION:
PLANNING
COMMISSION:
3021 Arcade Street
Little Canada, MN 55109
The Little Canada Planning Commission will be reviewing this
matter at their Thursday, February 15, 2001 meeting. The meeting
begins at 7:30 p.m. and will be held in the Council Chambers of
the City Center located at 515 Little Canada Road in said City.
CITY COUNCIL: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held by the
City Council on Wednesday, February 28, 2001 at 7:30 p.m., or as
soon thereafter as parties may be heard, in the Council Chambers
of the City Center located at 515 Little Canada Road in said City.
All persons with reference to this matter will be heard during the Planning Commission meeting
on Thursday, February 15, 2001 and the City Council meeting on Wednesday, February 28,
2001.
Sign language interpreters for hearing- impaired persons are available for public hearings upon
request. The request for this service must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call to
make the necessary arrangements.
Joel R. Hanson
City Administrator
Page 13
NI4R1IWJWrkfl A % %4:1411Al'ka c04N1 %ta4•ANUe4,, liNit,
5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 nac@winternet.com
MEMORANDUM
TO: Little Canada Planning Commission
FROM: Stephen Grittman
DATE: February 13, 2001
RE: Little Canada - Theis Subdivision
FILE NO: 758.09 - 01.03
Background
Tom Theis has applied for a subdivision which would create three lots and an extension
of Leeward Way, between Arcade and Greenbriar in the northeast part of the City. Over
time, Leeward Way has been extended parcel by parcel, with an eventual connection to
Allan Avenue. This area has been the subject of previous study, with a long -term plan
providing for the connection to Allan Avenue, and eventually, an extension to the south
which would likely terminate in a cul -de -sac. Because of the number of property owners
in the area, the City Council has opted to allow the extensions to occur piece by piece as
individuals decided to develop. The parcel now in question is the last single owner to be
able to develop their own land without the cooperation of neighboring property owners.
Analysis
The proposal would extend Leeward Way south an additional 85.72 feet, providing for two
new buildable lots, one on each side of Leeward Way, and preservation of the existing
home site on Arcade. The applicant's sketch illustrates a new property line which would
maintain a 30 foot setback to the rear line of the existing home as required. The plan
appears to show an accessory structure in the rear yard as well. This structure must
maintain a minimum 10 foot setback. A survey will be required to verify all lot dimensions
and setbacks as a part of any final approval prior to recording of the subdivision.
As part of this application, the applicant is also seeking the approval of a variance from the
maximum cul -de -sac length requirements of 500 feet. The current length is about 650 feet
from Arcade Street, and would be extended to about 735 feet. By approving the area
Page 14
concept plan, the City Council has inferred that the length of this "cul -de -sac" would
temporarily exceed standards until the connection to Allan is made.
The neighbors has noted one issue with the current design, however. At present, there
is not adequate paved space at the end of Leeward Way, resulting in the need for vehicles
- particularly garbage trucks - to use private driveways for turning around to exit the
neighborhood. This has reportedly resulted in damage to driveways on occasion.
Because the termination of this street is temporary, staff has been reluctant to recommend
a large cul -de -sac. A "hammer- head" design may be adequate for this purpose without
requiring a substantial area, however, the recommendation of the City Engineer on this
point would be beneficial.
The Planning Commission should also take note of the map prepared by the City Engineer
for the future street improvements. The location of Leeward Way in this area begins to
curve slightly to align with its future extension. The City Engineer should verify that the
final design proposed by the applicant matches the long -term design requirements. This
curve will be important as it may be required to ensure that the westerly lot (Tract C) meets
the minimum 10,000 square feet of area. It is currently drawn at about 9,300 square feet.
Tract B should have more than adequate area as drawn, appearing to be about 12,600
square feet.
Summary and Recommendation
Planning Staff recommends approval of the proposed subdivision as it appears to meet the
long -term expectations for street extensions in this area. The following conditions should
be included in this recommendation:
1. Verification by Certified Survey that lots meet all area and setback requirements of
the zoning ordinance.
2. Verification that the final design meets the City Engineer's recommendations for
future street and utility alignment.
3. Provision for a temporary turn - around at the end of the Leeward Way extension,
pursuant to recommendations from the City Engineer.
cc: Kathy Glanzer
Greg Schroeder
Steve Westerhaus
Terry Maurer
Page 15
0 (73)
Q P
7
.<C(53)
ry In (a9)
5 i'Y Ca
/rY/.Y•1����V `1
4.32ec.
!419.bo1 7
ALLAN
(74)
f (C5) c
A 6
2.Ibac
221.95
11
flm7
.j: 13 0
�rc
7z) 50 13�
-1J. i - -47 ac ' 247 1152.1. �l
{.9g1i 332c Cq�_i m A 1.69pc.
.51 e. I X20 -' O]0 19 N
J 20 0o n 1
21 { o 4'WI' 19
O NI .SIC .fuZX.
54 ac.. .522c. m
";No
129 I;1(
;13'5 (80)
zI r
•�'•o
9 I
as
1a N \1.76 ac)
9
ea 37.72
.497,x
`60) I.0
14x a
Page 16
E
fr
Go
JAN -30-01 TUE 10 17
CITY OF LITTLE CANADA
ti
z
Is
ALLAN
:X. vn
a
W
U
0eeem3ar 30, 999 11:09;12 y.m.
909340.1 \3080 }0ex90900.03V I
C
FAX NO. 6514844538
WINLiWARQ WAY ..1
2
_ — J k —
//%
.N
P. 04
WINDROW DR.
/9
Pun 0
/B
I7
r J
I
r
5
7
/5
/r
11 TEL
c1
3U40 12.4'
It
t2
9 111 139'
CONSTR.
SvFR F}
ANITAR
CT MANH0LE-
STING 8"
LINE
I •0oR
�M,
W£sTWIND DR.
"Assumed ground
elevation at
cul -de —sac =918.0
FUTURE
8 "PVC 40.4%
APPROX. 1120 FT.
0 200
Yi
Hated R Steen Carcery
ALLAN AVENUE THOROUGHFARE
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
ALIGNMENT
Little Canada
EXHIBIT
1
Page 17
0,0 'r
VM CI4VM33�
Page 18
flc.gbiPb[G9 'ON V0H
"CL '38
L, .S8
kA
t
0
-f-
58
J
0
r
UCUNU ; 7,7.1.117 i0 ATI3 , : :0 [ 71.001 t0
E0'd 'lIlol
Howard R. Green Company
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
February 23 2001
File: 803950. -0325
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Little Canada
515 Little Canada Road East
Little Canada, MN 55117 -1633
RE: THEIS SUBDIVISION — LEEWARD WAY
CITY OF LITTLE CANADA
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
As requested, we have reviewed the possibility of extending Leeward Way south an additional
85.72 feet. Based upon our review of Stephen Grittman's memorandum, the Allan Avenue
Thoroughfare Plan, and discussions with Greg Schroeder, Public Works Director, we would
offer the following comments.
1. The lack of a method for tum- around at the end of Leeward Way has caused
that aepaved, temporary cul-de sac with a 30 foot radius be required when the sleet
Is extended. The 30 -foot radius cul- de-sac is a deviation from the current City
standard; however, this cul-de -sac would be temporary and this size cul-de -sac does
exist in other areas of the City where there is minimal street right -of -way. Bituminous
curb could be used around the temporary cud -de -sac to minimize the construction
cost and the cost of removal when the street is extended.
2. The Allen Avenue Thoroughfare Plan shows this area to be served with storm sewer
and sanitary sewer from the south. However, it may be possible to extend the storm
sewer and sanitary sewer from the north to serve this small subdivision area. The
watermain should be extended to the south edge of the proposed subdivision to
allow for a future loop as the area to the south is developed.
If you have any questions regarding these comments, please call.
Sincerely,
Howard R. Green Company
Lee Elfering
O:\PROJ1803950J103254.tr 02 -23-01 Council
1326 Energy Park Drive • St. Paul, MN 55'
EOtZ0'd 9446 449 TS9
Page 19
AAR 4..11
MOH 9P:TT T00Z- 2Z -83d
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 15, 2001
parcel of land for the Highway 36 right -of -way. Mr. Kimmes reported
that he is confident that this situation can be resolved within the next few
months.
Keis asked what has changed that makes Mr. Kimmes feel the matter can
be resolved.
Kimmes indicated that his surveyor had somewhat dropped the ball on this
issue and the plat spent some time sitting on someone's desk. Kimmes
reported that he is anxious to begin development this spring, and he has an
attorney, his surveyor, and the County working on resolving the issue.
Kimmes pointed out that no changes have been made to the plat from what
was approved previously.
Duray asked if the plat should be re- approved conditioned upon resolution
of the title issue. The City Planner indicated that such a condition would
not need to be placed on approval since this is an issue that will need to be
resolved at the County level prior to recording of the plat.
There was no one from the general public present wishing to comment on
this matter.
Knudsen recommended approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat for
Gilanderi Addition as well as approval of a Variance allowing a cul -de -sac
length in excess of 500 feet subject to compliance with all previous
conditions placed on the original approval.
Motion seconded by Carson.
Motion carried 7 — 0.
PROPERTY Mr. Tom Theis, 3036 Leeward Way, appeared before the Commission
DIVISION & requesting approval of the division of 3021 Arcade Street into three lots
VARIANCE — as well as a Variance from the City's restriction on cul -de -sac length.
3021 ARCADE Theis pointed out that he is proposing to extend the Leeward Way cul -de-
STREET — sac by 87 feet to provide street access for the two new lots. Theis noted
TOM THEIS that eventually Leeward Way will continue south with a connection
provided to Allen Avenue.
ONINNIUMMONNO
Theis reported that currently Leeward Way dead -ends without a cul -de -sac
at the end, and he is proposing the same for the 87 -foot extension of the
street. Theis felt it was impractical to put a cul -de -sac at the end of
Leeward Way at this point given the potential for the street to be extended
in the future, and given that the area that would be required for a cul -de-
Page 20
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 15, 2001
sac would bring the cul -de -sac right up to the garage doors for the homes
that would be constructed on the two new lots.
Keis asked if the Fire Department has looked at the proposal. Theis
replied that they had not, but noted that they did look at the last extension
that occurred in 1994. At that time the Fire Department required that a
fire hydrant be installed in the area of the new homes to provide better
access to water. Theis indicated that garbage trucks drive into the
Leeward Way area and then back out to the cul -de -sac at the intersection
of Leeward Way and Windward Way.
Roycraft reported that he asked the City Administrator to provide the
thoroughfare plan for the area that is before the Commission this evening.
Roycraft stated that he recognizes the need for a plan for future
development of this area, and felt it was to everyone's advantage to have a
comprehensive plan for the area, rather than development which occurs
two lots at a time.
Theis pointed out that this is the last small extension of Leeward Way that
can occur given that the next properties to the south are two large parcels.
The next extension will either be a turn into Allen Avenue or the full
extension of Leeward Way to the south. The City Planner agreed.
Roycraft stated that his concern was the thoroughfare plan and the need
for a comprehensive development of the area as a whole. Roycraft stated
that he was concerned with extending Leeward Way in a temporary
fashion now without any idea for when the rest of the area would develop.
Edward Inman, 785 LaBore Road, indicated that he owns the large
westerly parcel to the south of this proposal. Inman proposed that a half
street be developed on his property so that Leeward Way could be
connected to Allen Avenue. Inman stated that he is interested in
continuing the extension of Leeward Way so that he can do some
development of his property.
Keis pointed out that the issue of putting in a half street raises some other
issues for the City.
Jim Otto, 3025 Leeward Way, expressed concern about the lack of a cul-
de -sac on the end of Leeward Way and the resulting problems for vehicles
wishing to turn around. Otto stated that he was interested in getting some
turn around at the end of the street so that vehicles would not turn around
in his driveway.
Page 21
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 15, 2001
Theis indicated that he understands Otto's concern, but pointed out that he
is not changing the situation, he is just extending what currently exists
another 87 feet.
Knudsen asked if Theis read the Planner's report and the recommendation
for a temporary turn- around at the end of the Leeward Way extension.
Theis replied that he did and indicated that he would be willing to install
some sort of turnaround.
Knudsen asked how a temporary turnaround would happen. The City
Planner indicated that the street pavement would be installed down the
middle of the right -of -way. In the last fifteen feet or so the pavement
could flair out to provide a temporary turn- around area. This extra
pavement could then be removed at the time Leeward Way is extended.
The City Planner also pointed out that when Leeward Way is extended to
the south, it will jog slightly to the east to line the street up to straddle the
common property line for 785 and 791 LaBore Road.
Jason Larson, 3035 Leeward Way, indicated that he purchased his home
because it was located on a dead -end street and indicated that he would
like to see Leeward Way remain as such.
Keis pointed out the potential for the street to extend further south and
have a connection to Allen Avenue.
Roycraft stated that he did not like the temporary turn - around situation at
the end of Leeward Way. He pointed out that during the winter, the turn
around area becomes smaller with snow storage.
Debby Lancette, 791 LaBore Road, asked about assessments for the road
improvement. The City Planner replied that the street extension proposed
by Mr. Theis would be paid for by him. The Planner noted that at the time
the property to the south is developed, the benefiting property owners
would pay the cost of the street extension at that time.
Debby Lancette pointed out that a property owner of a lot on Allen
Avenue had wanted to develop his lot, and the Council indicated that they
would not allow a dead end street to service this lot. The City Planner
indicated that the situation was that the property owner wanted to serve his
lot with a driveway on the street right -of -way. The Code requires that
City lots front on an improved street, and the property owner on the other
side of the right -of -way was not in favor the street improvement.
The Planner further pointed out that Code restricts the length of cul -de-
sacs to 500 feet in length. Because the Leeward Way cul -de -sac is a
Page 22
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 15, 2001
temporary situation, the Council approved a variance for the length to
exceed 500 feet.
Keis asked if installation of a cul -de -sac at the end of Leeward Way would
interfere with the potential for future extension of that street to the south.
The Planner replied that a full cul -de -sac at the end of the street would
eliminate the potential for the two lots Mr. Theis is proposing.
Inman again indicated that he would be in favor of the half street and
pointed out that this would allow Mr. Theis to develop as well as the
property owner on Allen Avenue that wanted to develop.
The City Planner indicated that he would like to discuss the half - street
option with the City Engineer as well as explore options for providing a
turn- around area at the end of Leeward Way under the Theis proposal.
Keis stated that the question is would the City allow a half road.
Greg Lancette reported that he was opposed to the half road option being
discussed. Lancette explained some past history relative to the
development of the Leeward Way area and indicated that he would only
consider developing his property is if Mr. Inman dies or sells all of his
land to a developer and moves out of the area.
Keis suggested that the Commission get back to the issue at hand, the
property division and variance requested by Mr. Theis.
Lancette stated that he wanted to see the jog in the road so that the future
extension of Leeward Way would straddle the common lot line between
his property and Inman's. Theis stated that he was agreeable to the jog in
the road as well as would be willing to flair out the end of the street so that
there would be some sort of turn around area.
Duray pointed out that it would be difficult to find a solution to the
development issues at this time other than ending the road as proposed by
Mr. Theis with some sort of turn around at the end.
The Commission discussed the half road suggested by Mr. Inman.
Roycraft felt that the half road would address some immediate needs, but
felt that it would be to everyone's advantage to adopt at a thoroughfare
plan for the area. Keis pointed out that the concept thoroughfare plan for
the area is being used as a guideline for future development. Keis felt that
a thoroughfare plan should not be formally adopted until such time as the
property owners want to develop their property.
Page 23
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 15, 2001
ADJOURN
Roycraft stated that he was not happy with a temporary solution to this
matter.
Otto pointed out that the temporary extension of Leeward Way proposed
by Mr. Theis could exist for years. Therefore, he preferred to see a cul -de-
sac or some turn- around area developed as part of this property division.
Theis indicated that he was agreeable to putting in a temporary turn
around, but pointed out that a full cul -de -sac was not feasible.
The City Planner pointed out that the City Engineer should be able to
design some sort of temporary turn around that would address the
concerns raised by neighboring property owners.
Barraclough recommended approval of the property division dividing
3021 Arcade Street into three Lots as well as the variance from the City's
limitation on cul -de -sac length subject to compliance with the
recommendations of the City Planner as outlined in his report dated
February 13, 2001, subject to compliance with any recommendations of
the City Engineer, and subject to the road jogging so that the road right -of-
way will eventually straddle the common property line between the Inman
and Lancette properties.
Motion seconded by Knudsen.
Motion carried 6 — 1. Roycraft voted against.
Mr. Keis recommended that the meeting be adjourned.
Motion seconded by Knudsen.
Motion carried 7 — 0.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
Respe tfull sub 'jiedd
Kt y Glanzer
Deputy Clerk
Page 24
ce+ V
515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 55117-1600
(651) 766 -4029 / FAX: (651) 766 -4048
Email: cityhall @ci.little- canada.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Fahey and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joel R. Hanson, City Administrator
DATE: February 22, 2001
RE: Precision Tree & Landscape
MAYOR
Michael I. Fahey
COUNCIL,
Beverly Scalze
Jim LaValle
Matt Anderson
Rick Montour
ADMINISTRATOR
Joel R. Hanson
At the May 9, 2000 Council meeting, we tabled action on the Precision Tree Conditional
Use Permit and Variance pending a staff report on Tax Increment financing to assist this
project (a waiver from the 60 -day rule pending receipt of this report was received from
the applicant).
Staff reviewed this matter and discovered that TIF assistance is not possible due to the
nature of Precision Landscape & Tree's business. The use must be industrial or
warehousing in nature to qualify for the creation of a new TIF district. Given their
modifications to the site design and our approval of an agreement with them to allow the
sale to proceed, the issue of TIF assistance is no longer critical to this project.
The Planner's will have a report ready for Wednesday's meeting addressing the revisions
to the site plan.
Page 25
34.!
9 039 de Nm MN O HI DS AO D1111 • ON 0/le os
Page 26
Gilbert Proposal
Construction Company Inc
1202 Jackson Street
ST PAUL MINNESOTA 55117
(651) 488 -2587 Date 12/07/00
FAX (651) 488 -2588
Page 1
Ti Precision Tree Company Concrete and 3lasoary for
942 East Co Road D Job Name 100'x:.30' building
Little Canada MN. 55109 Location Little Canada MN
To include:
1 24 "x12" concrete footings with two #5 reinforcing bars.
2 6" concrete slab on grade using 4000# concrete with fiber mesh reinforcing.
3 4" concrete sidewalk 20' long by 6' wide with monolithic curbs.
4 6" concrete apron at overhead doors.
5 12" concrete block below grade with 2" of rigid insulation from the top of the footing to the underside of the
slab.
6 Plain concrete block above grade with a bearing height of 18'. Wall shall include vertical reinforcing with core
till 4' on center. Remaining voids in the concrete block shall be filled with foam insulation.
7 We have included openings for four 14'x14' overhead doors. We will set the lintels that are supplied by others,
S'-ndard Exclusions
Dewatering, mud removal, e.xctvation, backtill, waterproofing, datnpproofng, misc. steel, caulking, bonds, permits, water repellant coatings
layout, staking, lightpole and sign bases, testing, repair or curling, era/mg/shrinkage, protection of glass or completed slabs, temporary
utilities, including water, power, lighting, dumpscers or winter conditions.
We Propose hereby to furnish material and labor in accordance with these specifications for the sum of
Eighty Two Thousand Four Hundred Sixty Eight Dollars
A'! Main sl is guaranteed :o be as specified. All Mork to be wmplewd a: a workmw lies ma: n r
=cording to standard practice. Any a eadon or deviation from above spcciteauons mvoh'utg
aa Cosa will be exxoted only upon t.ataen orders, and will became an c ara chine ova
and above die estimate ALL agreemenn coming= ucva strikes, a '.dcnls or delays beyond
OUT wnauL Owner to czrry are, lomauo and other nosssary utsurancc. Our workers are P\Uy
co'.aea by Workmen's Compeawtioo Insmancc. Price good for 30 days
$$82,468.00
Acceptance of Proposal
Precision Tree Company
The sued acccpiancc of those condrnuns by tae
perchaaa slgniit:s u contract to p"rta e
m toms apecifia6 Pa>mcn: wul b• rcade wnt,in 10
days of the invoii .
Signature Date
Page 27
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
APRIL 13, 2000
CUP —
SO. OWASSO
BLVD:
PRECISION
TREE
Montour suggested to Mr. Mikrot that he consider moving the fence
behind the landscaping.
Ms. Kraemer recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit for
outdoor storage at 221 -225 Ryan Drive as requested by Mikrot Roofing
subject to compliance with the recommendations of the City Planner.
Motion seconded by Carson.
Motion carried 7 — 0.
The City Planner reported that Precision Tree has requested a Conditional
Use Permit for outdoor storage and a Variance from the setback
requirements in order to locate their business on the triangular piece of
property on South Owasso Blvd.
Duray asked about screening the business from the residential use at the
back of the property. Precision Tree noted that the existing trees will
remain on the back angle of the property. These trees currently provide
screening from the adjacent residential use.
Precision Tree noted the shape of the property which limits the usable
area. Precision Tree requested that they be allowed more outdoor storage
area for their business than is currently allowed in the I -P District.
The City Planner indicated that the I -P District sets some strict limitations
on the amount of outdoor storage. Additionally, the I -P District requires
the use of certain materials for building construction. The Planner noted
that Precision Tree has a lot of outdoor storage needs. The company has
had some difficulty in finding a compatible site for their business, and the
Planner noted that they are relocating from their site on Country Drive. A
critical issue is that the business is being forced to relocate because of a
City- assisted project on Country Drive.
Montour asked the size of Precision Tree's current outdoor storage area.
Precision Tree estimated the size at 1/2 acre and reported that this is what
they are proposing on the South Owasso Blvd. property. There is no
increase in outdoor storage area over what they currently have. Precision
Tree also pointed out the proposed placement of their building on the site
and the plans for future expansion of the building. Precision Tree also
presented the Commission with a list of building materials, which they
indicated will meet the ordinance requirements.
Page 28
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
APRIL 13, 2000
Precision Tree indicated that they are proposing to surface their parking
lot with millings which would be compacted. The Planner is
recommending that the parking areas be blacktopped.
It was noted that the Ordinance limits outdoor storage to 75% of the size
of the building or 25% of the size of the property, whichever is less.
Montour noted that Precision Tree did not meet these limitations on
Country Drive. The Planner pointed out that the Country Drive property
was not zoned I -P, therefore, not subject to these requirements.
Precision Tree noted that they are changing locations due to government
action. Therefore, felt that they should be allowed to continue operating
with the '/z acre of outdoor storage that they currently have.
Knudsen pointed out that the Commission has to deal with the issue of
precedent. If the governmental action is ajustification for allowing the
outdoor storage to exceed I -P District limitations, he did not want to see
governmental action used as a reason for any variance from Code
requirements.
Kraemer pointed out that the move is necessitated by a governmental
action, and Precision Tree is not proposing any more outdoor storage than
they currently have.
Knudsen indicated that he felt the plan was a reasonable one, but he did
not want to set a precedent and leave the door open for someone else.
Precision Tree also pointed out that the outdoor storage would not be
visible from the street.
Montour asked if there are future plans to increase the amount of outdoor
storage. Precision Tree indicated that if they add on to their building, they
may approach the City for an increase in outdoor storage area. The
Planner pointed out that any expansion of the site will require an
amendment to the CUP.
Duray asked how long Precision Tree has been looking for sites. They
replied that they have been looking for 7 or 8 months. Sites are at a
premium and difficult to find. Precision Tree would also prefer to remain
in Little Canada.
Knudsen recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit for
outdoor storage and the Variance from the setback requirements for the
triangular property located on South Owasso Blvd. as requested by
Precision Tree subject to compliance with the recommendations of the
Page 29
MINU I'ES
PLANNING COMMISSION
APRIL 13, 2000
City Planner and declaring the following findings of fact relative to the
variance:
*That the relocation is necessitated as a result of governmental
action and requires Precision Tree to relocate to a property that
has a different zoning than their existing site;
*That the amount of outdoor storage being proposed is not being
increased in size from what Precision Tree has at their current
location.
Motion seconded by Kraemer.
Motion carried 7 — 0.
REZONING — The Commission reviewed the proposal to rezone certain properties along
COUNTY to either Residential Business (RB) or Single- Family Residential (R -1).
ROAD C The City Planner presented the Commission with diagrams showing the
existing zoning on the property as well as three rezoning options.
Knudsen pointed out that the RB zoning would allow either a residential
use or a transitional business use and is more restrictive than what would
be allowed under the General Business (B -3) zoning. The City Planner
indicated that the RB zoning allows a limited office use such as a
professional office. The B -3 zoning would allow almost any commercial
use except for auto - related uses.
Mickey Hentges, 60 Rosewood Drive, expressed concern about the
condition of the property at 61 County Road C, and indicated that she
would be concerned about a commercial use on this property that would
result in her looking out over a parking lot. Hentges reported that there is
a garage that is falling down on the property and the City has not
addressed the problem.
The City Planner pointed out that under the current B -3 zoning, anyone
could come in for a building permit to put in a commercial business on
this property. Under an RB zoning, a Conditional Use Permit would be
required, which would result in Planning Commission review and a Public
Hearing at the City Council level. The CUP process also allows for
conditions to be placed on the business.
Keis stated that he supported Option A as proposed by the Planner, which
calls for the rezoning of the three lots east of the coffee shop to RB and the
remaining lots keeping their current R -1 zoning. Keis pointed out that the
three lots east of the coffee shop are located across from properties zoned
Page 30
MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL
MAY 9, 2000
The City Administrator indicated that City staff's position is the five -foot
easement offered by the Klidzejs at the last Council meeting along their
property line was unnecessary. He noted that widening the existing
sanitary sewer easement on the Mitchell property from 15 feet to 20 only
brings that easement a foot or two closer to the new home under
construction on this property. Therefore, placing the additional easement
on the Klidzejs property does not give the new home the ability to have a
wrap - around deck without encroaching into the easement area.
Fahey acknowledged the letter received from Leopold Klidzejs relative to
the easement that he was required to grant when his property was
subdivided. Fahey noted that the City is not giving any property to the
developer of 3240 Twin Lake Road. Scalze agreed, and noted that the
easement will remain as a public right -of -way easement.
Morelan asked if the additional triangular easement adjacent to the cul -de-
sac would allow for the future subdivision of Tract A into two lots. The
City Administrator replied that that was correct.
Mr. Morelan introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -5 -116 — APPROVING THE SUBDIVISION
OF 3240 TWIN LAKE ROAD INTO THREE SINGLE - FAMILY
PARCELS AS REQUESTED BY PREFERRED HOMES SUBJECT
TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
CITY PLANNER AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION
The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Pedersen.
Ayes (4) Morelan, Pedersen, Scalze, Fahey.
Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted.
CUP & Fahey noted that the public hearing on the CUP and Variance
VARIANCE — requested by Precision Tree was closed at the last Council meeting.
SO. OWASSO
BLVD. — Scalze noted Precision Tree's Country Drive site plan that was
PRECISION approved in 1992 which designates an outdoor storage area of 50
TREE feet by 80 feet. She further noted that some of this area also included
employee parking. Scalze indicated that at the last Council meeting,
Precision Tree indicated that they were requesting outdoor storage on the
South Owasso site of the same size as they have on Country Drive. That
size was estimated at approximately one half acre. The 1992 site plan
shows that outdoor storage is to be contained to 50 feet by 80 feet.
Page 31
MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL
MAY 9, 2000
Fahey indicated that preliminary information shows poor soils on the
South Owasso Blvd. site. However, before going to the expense of having
soil borings done, Precision Tree would like an indication of whether or
not the Council will support their development proposal for this site.
Fahey noted that it is clear that a half -acre of outdoor storage was not
approved for the Country Drive site. Fahey indicated that his impression
is that Precision Tree should be allowed to continue to do business in the
same fashion as was approved for their Country Drive site. He indicated
that the variance proposed for the amount of outdoor storage was too great
a departure from the standards of the I -P Zoning District.
Precision Tree indicated that they need sufficient outdoor storage for four
trucks and for woodpiles as well as the ability to maneuver the trucks
around. The City Administrator indicated that the maneuvering area is
generally not considered in calculating the outdoor storage area.
Scalze asked how the City would maintain control over the amount of
outdoor storage on the site. The Administrator indicated that periodic
inspections would have to occur to ensure that the outdoor storage was not
expanded.
Morelan pointed out from the Planner's report that Precision Tree is
proposing a phased development. The first phase would be a building
approximately 3,680 square feet in size that results in the outdoor storage
being 120% of the building area. The second phase expands the building
by 3,360 square feet, which results in outdoor storage being 63% of the
building size that is in compliance with the standards of the I -P District.
Scalze noted that at the Planning Commission meeting, Precision Tree
indicated that they would not need more outdoor storage than what is
being proposed. Precision Tree indicated that was correct.
Fahey indicated that at first he was sympathetic to Precision Tree's request
because of the governmental action involved in the acquisition of their
property on Country Drive. However, in reviewing the 1992 CUP request
for the Country Drive site, it is clear that the outdoor storage was limited
to 50 feet by 80 feet and that the current request goes beyond that amount.
Fahey indicated that he would support the request if the outdoor storage
area meets the limitations established under the I -P District.
It was noted that the building proposed by Precision Tree would meet the
building materials standards established by the I -P District.
Fahey noted that the City would have no assurance that phase two would
be completed. He pointed out that Precision Tree located on Country
Page 32
MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL
MAY 9, 2000
Drive with the understanding that this was a redevelopment area. Fahey
felt it was reasonable to try to relocated Precision Tree somewhere else in
the City, but felt that the variance being requested for the South Owasso
Blvd. site was not justified.
Pedersen pointed out that either the size of the outdoor storage must be
decreased or the size of the building must be increased. It was noted that
outdoor storage must be screened from the public right -of -way, and that
the building being proposed may provide that screening.
Precision Tree indicated that they could build a larger building if they
were given Tax Increment Financing assistance. Morelan noted that there
must be justification for granting TIF assistance such as poor soil
conditions and/or low land.
The City Administrator noted that either an existing TIF District would
have to be amended to include this property or a new TIF District created.
The Administrator also indicated that a building of the size being proposed
by Precision Tree would not generate a lot of increment.
Morelan asked what Precision Tree would do with the additional building
space. Precision Tree replied that they would likely lease it out. Morelan
noted that the user should be a business without the need for outdoor
storage.
The City Administrator suggested that he have Rusty Fifield look at this
concept to determine if it would work.
Fahey suggested that Precision Tree do a precise calculation of their
needs. He noted that the Planning Commission supported the variance
given the statements by Precision Tree that their outdoor storage is not
being increased from what they have on Country Drive. However,
revising the 1992 CUP action shows that Precision Tree was limited to a
50 foot by 80 foot outdoor storage area and not to a half acre of outdoor
storage. Fahey again indicated that Precision Tree needs to more
precisely define their needs.
The City Administrator pointed out that outdoor storage is separate from
required parking. He also indicated that it was acceptable to use the
building as screening for the storage area.
Scalze stated that she would support TIF assistance to enable Precision
Tree to increase the size of their proposed building, however, indicated
that the outdoor storage would have to conform to the requirements of the
ordinance.
Page 33
MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL
MAY 9, 2000
Morelan suggested a temporary variance predicated on some assurance
that the building addition would be constructed within a certain amount of
time plus a soils report indicating that the property would support an
addition to the building. Morelan noted that with the phase two building
addition, the outdoor storage area proposed drops to 65% of the building
size, under the 75% maximum allowed by code.
Fahey noted that even under that scenario Precision Tree must be
convinced of the amount of outdoor storage that is adequate to run his
business. Fahey stated that he did not want to get into an enforcement
action to require Precision Tree to decrease their outdoor storage area.
Precision Tree noted that with TIF assistance he could build a bigger
building and that a bigger building may allow him to put equipment inside
and decrease the amount of outdoor storage he needs.
Fahey stated that rather than an interim variance approval, he would prefer
that the building size is increased and the outdoor storage brought into
compliance with the I -P standards. Fahey suggested that staff investigate
the possibility of TIF assistance for this project.
Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -5 -117 — TABLING ACTION ON THE
PRECISION TREE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE
REQUEST PENDING A STAFF REPORT ON THE OPTION OF TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING ASSISTANCE FOR THIS PROJECT
AND REQUIRING A 60 -DAY WAIVER FROM PRECISION TREE
The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Scalze.
Ayes (4) Fahey, Scalze, Morelan, Pedersen.
Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted.
17tANSIT Chris Weyer, Metro Transit, appeared before the Council reporting on
HUB AT their plans for a transit hub at the Market Place Shopping Center. Weyer
MARKET indicated that Metro Transit would comply with the recommendations of
PLACE the Public Works Director relative to the transit hub. He also noted that
the hub would allow six buses to line up on the south side of First Bank
Drive. The hub does not include a formal park and ride lot, but would
rather serve as a transfer station. Weyer also indicated that Metro Transit
will dress up the area with planters and street lights of the same style as
are being proposed on Little Canada Road.
Page 34
FEB 21 '01 11:42AM VARIETY P.2/2
oil
geL Orots,
itteaunti eL".0 Afitio,
aokuwith 4pita 5 Amt.&
cats ty se 65040 eviel
%-fo fro. °c ctiuck taw frnakitA2 t tc%.,
otA-etotadecr. Aec
c7 /, cam/
Inba),
Page 35
Gambling Control Board Fax :651- 639 -4073
Min
Feb 15 '01 1534 P. 02
Page 1 of 2
8/00
- - -- -e
LG220 - Application for Exempt Permit Fee - $25
Forerun' Use Only
F « Pala
Organization Information
Check No,
O anization name Previous lawful gambling exemption number
flOgineg 0 Off OS op fl4C.ser: AUcCf p-' &CAQUi it, Itac.
Street
/4q0 scam I-r-/ .
City Staterrap Code
s-c +Aut MN 567oS
County r
1f'ImhSeV
Name of chief executive officer (CEO)
First name Last name
C',NR .. Di etNiooK
Daytime phone number of CEO
/pl a 613 4V:
Name of treasurer
First name Last name
NOS muRPAY
Daytime phone number
treasurer:
461 - 69& -31a1
of
Typo of Nonprofit Organization
Check the box that best describes your organization:
❑ Fratemal ❑ Religious
❑ Veteran PKI Other nonprofit organization
Check SS box that indicates the type of proof your organization attached to this application:
J IRS letter Indicating income tax exempt status
❑ Certificate of Good Standing from the Minnesota Secretary of State's Office
❑ A charter showing you are an affiliate of a parent nonprofit organization
❑ Proof previously submitted and on file with the Gambling Control Board
Gambling Premises Information
Name of premises where gambling activity
11 -1€ UFl)f4lAN IPa0
wit be conducted (for raffles, rat the site where the drawing we take place)
Address (do not use PO box)
-?R ('/ «I C. 9f.
City
(.1fic . C.ANIk0A
State/ip Code
MN 56(13
County
Rlk y
Date(s) of activity (for raffles, indicate the date of the drawing)
mARCtk a6) a031
Cheek the box or boxes that indicate the type of gambrmg activity your organization will be conducting:
❑ -Bingo igfRaffles ■ 'Paddlewheels NI 'Pull-Tabs ❑Tipboards
'Equipment for these activities must be obtained from a licensed distributor.
This form will be made available in
altemative format (Le. large print, Braille)
upon request The information requested
on this form (and any attachments) we be
used by the Gambling Control Board
(Board) to determine your qualifications to
be involved in lawful gambing activities in
Minnesota. You haw the right to refuse to
supplythe information requested; however,
if refuse to supply this information, the
Board may not ba able to determine your
quaffiratione and. as a consequence, may
refuse to issue you a permit. if you supply
the information requested, the Board war
be able to process your application.
Your name and and your organization's
name and address wit be pubic information
when received by the Board. AN the other
information that you provide wit be private
data about you until the Board Issues your
permit. When the Board issues your
permit, el of the infonnadon that you have
provided to the Board In the process of
applying for your permitwil become public.
If the Board doss not Issue you a permit,
all the information you have provided in the
process of appying for a pwmti remains
private, with the exception of your name
and your organization's name and address
which we remain public.
Private data about you are available only to
Page 36
thetoMowing: Board members, staff of the
Board whose work assignment requires
that they have access to the information;
the Minnesota Department of Public Safety;
the Minnesota Attorney General: the
Minnesota Commiesioners of
Administration, Finance, and Revenue; the
Minnesota LegtchlhreAudltor, national and
ittemafionat gambing regulatory agencies;
anyone pursuant to court order; other
individuals and agencies that are
specifca i authorized by state or federal
law to haw access to the mformabon;
individuals and agencies for which law or
legal order authorizes a new use or sharing
of information after this Notice was given;
and anyone with your consent.
Gambling Control Board Fax:651- 639 -4073 Feb 15 '01 15:34 P. U3
Application for Exempt Permit - L0220 Psge 2 2
i3 of
Organization Name fOR/fl FR QOWaS OP 4Fk ... Si: PAUL. WI N?rcg GA+ 1 vAL i kr
Local Unit of Government Acknowledgment
•
if the gambling promises is within city Iimits, the
city must sign this application.
On behalf of the city, I acknowledge this application.
Check the action that
the city is taking on this application.
n The city approves the application with no
I 1 waiting period.
❑The city approves the application with a 30 day
wailing period, and allows the Board to issue a
permit after 30 days (60 days for a first class
city)
The city denies the application.
Print name of city
(Signature of Gry personnel rece'Ning applcation)
Tdb
Date / /
H the gambling premises is located In a township, both
the county and township must sign this application.
On behalf of the county, I acknowledge this application.
Check the action that
the county is taking on this application.
nThe county approves the application with no
waiting period.
❑ The county approves the application with a 30 day
waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a
permit after 30 days.
ElThe county denies the application.
Print name of county
(Signature of county personnel receiving application)
Trite
Data
TOWNSHIP: On behalf of the township, l acknowledge that
the organization it applying for exempla' gambling activity
within the township kmks. [A township has no statutory
authority to approve or deny an pppfication (Minn. Stat sec.
349.213, subd. 2)]
Print name of mvmshp
(Signature of township official acknowledging eppication)
Tile
Date /
Chief Executive Officer's Signature
The information provided in this a(12si,n. n is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
•
0 /0, .
Name (please print) ett4gMll $J. in • O' Cmo poR Date (g /14L,/ OJ
Chief executive officer's signature
Mail Application and Attachments
At least 45 days prior to your scheduled activity date send:
• the completed application,
• a copy of your proof of nonprofit status, and
• a $25 application fee (make check payable to "State of Minnesota ").
Application fees are not prorated, refundable, or transferable.
Send to: Gambling Control Board
1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South
Roseville, MN 55113
If your application has not
been acknowledged bythe
local and of government or
has been denied, do not
send the application to the
Gambing Control Board.
Page 37
02/14/2001 11:58 6514844525
VENETIANINN PAGE _ 01
The Venetian Inn agrees to lease
to 1(- _ PRA& Quatios , the
facilities located at 2814 Rice
Street. For the sum of
$ I.00 . For the purpose of a
fund raiper on date
03/x6/01 .
For the hours of 12 :00 (noon) to
12:00 (midnight).
Venetian
Inn
Leasee
61aiv. 6'a
Cw , -me foremt Caws
Of Ti- - ceictVC WooleR CAAm wAc, l oc .
Page 38
LITTLE CANADA
PARKS AND RECREATION
DEPARTMENT
515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 55117 -1600
Telephone: (651) 766 -4029 / Fax: (651) 766 -4048
JIM MORELAN, Director
(651) 766-4045
DON BOWMAN, Program Coordinator
(651) 766 -4041
DEREK ANDERSON, Program Coordinator
(651) 766 -4042
GREG HOAG, Parkkeeper
(651) 766-4056
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Fahey & Members of the City Council
FROM: Jim Morelan, Parks & Recreation Director
DATE: February 20, 2001
RE: Proposed Parks & Recreation Program Fees for 2001
Attached is a list of proposed fees for various Parks and Recreation programs and charges for
2001. These fees were based on the analysis of past program revenues and expenses, with the
goal of making most programs self - sustaining from the program fees. I also gave consideration
to fees charged by other parks and recreation departments in our area.
Based on this criteria, I recommend adopting the following fee schedule for 2001. I also would
like to maintain discretion to change any fees during the year as might prove necessary to
achieve the above goal due to more current cost information being available at the time the
program is conducted.
If you have any questions concerning the enclosed information, please contact me.
\ \C L.CSRVOI \I IOM E \KrisP \RECREATI \M isccllaneous \FEES. DOC
Page 39
PAR33106.xis
RAMSEY COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS
Traffic Services
Cvri TRACT WORK
RICE ST & SOUTH OWASSO BLVDSYSTEM A
INCLUDES INTERCONNECT AND RIGHT TURN LANES
CON 33106
PARTICIPATION COSTS
RASED ON I OW 1310 BY FRATTAI ONF
PARTICIPATION
ITEM NO.
ITEM
UNIT
TOTAL
ESTIMATED
QUANTITY
UNIT
PRICE
TOTAL
AMOUNT
RAMSEY COUNTY
GROUP 1
CITY - LITTLE CANADA
SAP 200 -102 -04
GROUP 2
CITY.ROSEVILLE
SAP 60-252 -01
GROUP 3
QUANT.
AMOUNT
QUANT.
AMOUNT
QUANT.
AMOUNT
2021.501
MOBILIZATION
LUMP SUM
1
518,400.00
518.400,00
0.69
512.696,00
0.17
53,128.00
0.14
52.57600
2102.501
PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL
S.F
625
51,65
51,031.25
492.00
5811.80
133,00
5219.45
0.00
30.00
2104.501
REMOVE 12' STORM SEWER PIPE
L.F.
12
525.00
5300.00
12.00
5300.00
0.00
50.00
0.00
50.00
2104.501
REMOVE CURB & GUTTER
L.F.
1196
51.85
52,212.60
1040.00
51,924.00
156,00
5288.60
0.00
50.00
2104.505
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
S.Y
74
55.50
5407,00
51.00
5280.50
23.00
5126.50
0.00
50.00
2104.513
SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)
L.F.
140
55.25
5735.00
120.00
5630.00
20.00
5105.00
0.00
5000
2104.509
REMOVE CATCH BASIN
EACH
1
5140.00
5140.00
1,00
5140.00
0.00
50.00
0.00
50.00
2104.509
REMOVE SURFACE DRAIN
EACH
2
5140.00
5280.00
2.00
5280.00
0.00
50.00
0.00
50.00
2105.501
COMMON EXCAVATION
C.Y.
1540
59.50
514.630.00
1440.00
513080.00
100.00
5950.00
0.00
50.00
2105.522
SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (LV)
C.V.
1058
512.50
513.22500
1010.00
512,625.00
48.00
5600.00
0.00
50.00
2105.526
SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW (LV)
C.Y.
155
514,50
52.247.50
143.00
52.07350
12.00
5174.00
0.00
50.00
2130.501
WATER (M)
GAL (M)
10
530.00
5300.00
8.00
5240.00
2.00
560.00
0.00
50.00
2211.503
AGGREGATE BASE. CLASS 6 (CV)
C.Y.
239
522.10
55,281.90
213.00
54,707.30
26.00
5574.60
0.00
50.00
2232.501
MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE, 2' DEPTH
S.Y.
722
53.85
52,779.70
589.00
52.267.65
133.00
5512.05
0.00
50.00
2340.508
TYPE 47 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE
TON
141
552.65
57,423,65
135.00
57.107,75
6.00
5315.90
0.00
50.00
2340.508
TYPE 41 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE
TON
32
564.75
52,072.00
27.00
51,748,25
5.00
5323.75
0.00
50.00
2340.510
TYPE 47 BINDER COURSE MIXTURE
TON
141
551.60
57,275.60
135.00
56,966.00
6.00
5309.60
0.00
50.00
2340.510
TYPE 31 BINDER COURSE MIXTURE
TON
32
563.75
52,040.00
27.00
51721.25
5.00
5318.75
0.00
50.00
2340.514
TYPE 31 BASE COURSE. MIXTURE
TON
132
550.55
56,672,60
122.00
56,167.10
10.00
5505.50
0.00
50.00
2357.502
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT
GAL
149
53.00
5447.00
135,00
5405.00
14.00
542.00
0.00
50.00
2502.541
4' PERFORATED P. E. PIPE DRAIN
L.F.
560
55.00
52,800.00
560.00
52,800.00
0.00
50.00
0.00
50.00
2503.541
IT RC PIPE SEWER, 0E5 3006 CL. V
L.F.
44
535.00
51,540.00
44.00
51,540.00
0.00
50.00
0.00
50.00
2504.602
RELOCATE HYDRANT
EACH
2
51.750,00
53,500.00
2.00
53.500.00
0.00
50.00
0.00
50.00
2504.602
ADJUST VALVE BOX
EACH
2
5150.00
5300.00
2.00
5300.00
0.00
50.00
0.00
50.00
2506.502
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE. DES. AOR F
EACH
2
51,000.00
52,000.00
2.00
52.000,00
0.00
50.00
0.00
5000
2506.502
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE, DES. C OR G
EACH
2
51.250,00
52,500.00
2.00
52,50000
0.00
50.00
0.00
50.00
2506.511
RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE
L.F.
6.3
5215.00
51.354,50
6.30
$1,354,50
0.00
50.00
0.00
50.00
2506.516
CASTING ASSEMBLY
EACH
3
5350.00
51.050,00
3.00
51,050.00
0.00
50.00
0.00
50.00
2506,522
ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING
EACH
1
5200.00
5200.00
1.00
5200.00
0.00
50.00
0.00
50.00
2531.501
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER. DES. 6624
L.F.
1154
510.15
511,713.10
998.00
510,129.70
156.00
51,583.40
0.00
50.00
2531.602
CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP
EACH
4
5845.00
53,380.00
4.00
53.380.00
0.00
50.00
0.00
50.00
2563.601
TRAFFIC CONTROL
LUMP SUM
1
53,67500
53.675.00
0.69
52,535.75
0.17
5624.75
0.14
5514.50
2564.602
PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LEFT AROW) EPDXY
EACH
4
5120.00
5480.00
4.00
5480.00
0.00
50.00
0.00
30.00
2564.602
PAVEMENT MESSAGE (RIGHT ARONO EPDXY
EACH
6
5130.00
5780.00
700
5520.00
2.00
5260.00
0.00
5000
2564.603
4' SOLID LINE WHITE-EPDXY
L.F.
890
50.60
5534,00
790.00
5474,00
100.00
560.00
0.00
50.00
2564.603
4' DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW-EPDXY
L.F.
675
51.25
5843.75
500.00
5625.00
175.00
5218.75
0.00
50.00
2564.604
ZEBRA CROSSWALK WHITE -EPDXY
S.F
705
54.30
53.031.50
705.00
53,031,50
0.00
50.00
0.00
50.00
2573.502
SILT FENCE, TYPE HEAVY DUTY
L.F.
1141
53.00
53.423.00
999.00
52,997.00
142.00
5426.00
0.00
50.00
2575.505
SODDING, TYPE LAWN
S.Y.
1408
52.45
53.449.60
129700
53,177.65
111.00
5271.95
0.00
50.00
2575.532
COMMERCIAL FERT., ANALYSIS I0 -20.20
POUND
73
51,25
591.25
67.00
583.75
6.00
57.50
0.00
50.00
2564.531
SIGN PANELS TYPE 0
S.F.
42
528.60
51,201.20
4200
51,201.20
0.00
50.00
0.00
50.00
2565.511
FULL T. ACT. T. CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM A
SIG. SYS.
1
5156.500.00
5156.500,00
0.50
578.250,00
0.25
539.125,00
0.25
539.125.00
2565.601
EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION SYSTEM A
L. SUM
1
55,20000
55,200.00
0.00
50.00
0.50
52.600,00
0.50
52.600.00
2565.602
PVC HANDHOLE (INTERCONNECT)
EACH
4
5755.00
53,020.00
4.00
53.020.00
0.00
50.00
0.00
50.00
2565.603
2' NON-METALLIC CONDUIT (INTERCONNECT)
L.F.
1134
59.50
510.773.00
1134.00
510773,00
0.00
50.00
0.00
50.00
2565.603
610 FIBER OPTIC (INTERCONNECT)
L.P.
2078
53.25
56,753.50
2078.00
56,753.50
0.00
50.00
0.00
50.00
TOTAL 5317,994.20
Suer 5219,447.65
SUET. 553,731.05
SUB T. $44,815.50
Engineering & Inspection (6Y) 53,223.86
G and Total 556,954.91
Page 42
52,688.93
547,504.43
Program
Proposed 2001 Parks & Recreation Fees
2000 2001
Day Camp $80 $85
T -Ball 17 20
Baseball 55 62
Youth Slow Pitch (3 -9) 28 28
After School Tennis 18 18
Tennis Lessons 32 32
Golf Lessons 30 30
Soccer (Grade 2) 18 18
Soccer (3 -8) 28 30
Soccer Clinic 17 17
Youth Volleyball 30 38
Gymnastics 30 32
Basketball League 54 54
Basketball Clinic 20 22
Skating Lessons 18 20
Babysitter Safety 40 50
Kids- er -cise 25 28
Adult Softball 480 -500 490 -510
Senior Exercise 15 16
55 Alive Driving Class 10 12
Adult Volleyball 2 3
Adventures in the Park 30 30
Floor Hockey 28 32
Park Shelter Reservations* 22/33/55/80 22/33/55/80
FEE
Sat. & Sun.
*Location Facility Mon.-Fri. & Holidays
Spooner Park Lower Shelter $33 $33
Spooner Park Upper Shelter $55 $80
Pioneer Park DeSoto Shelter $22 $22
C LCSRV01' I1OME \KrisP \ REC. REATI \M iscellmieousFEES.DOC
Page 40
515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 55117 -1600
(651) 766 -4029 / FAX: (651) 766 -4048
Email: cityhall @ci.little- canada.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Fahey and Members of the City Council
FROM: Greg Schroeder, Public Works Director
DATE: February 23, 2001
RE: South Owasso /Rice Street 'Traffic Signal
Improvement No. 00 -04
MAYOR
Michael 1. Fahey
COUNCIL
Beverly Scalze
Jim LaValle
Matt Anderson
Rick Montour
ADMINISTRATOR
Jocl R. 1- Janson
As you may recall, the South Owasso /Rice Street traffic signal project was designed and put out
for bid last year by Ramsey County. However, the project was cancelled due to delays in
obtaining the needed rights -of -way. The City concurred with the County's action last fall.
Ramsey County has rebid this project and will be recommending award of the project to the low
bidder, Frattalone Excavating. Based on last year's bid, the City of Little Canada's portion of
the costs of this project was $59,584.22. This year's bid has resulted in the City of Little
Canada's portion of the costs of this project being $56,954.91, a savings of $2,629.31 for the
City of Little Canada. As indicated last year, the City of Little Canada's portion would be paid
from the City's MSA Funds.
Based on the above, it is recommended that the City Council concur with Ramsey County's
recommendation to award this project to the low bidder, Frattalone Excavating, for the
construction of traffic signals and right turn lanes at the intersection of Rice Street and South
Owasso Blvd. and authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to execute agreements on behalf
of the City with the City's share of costs to come from MSA Funds.
Page 41
EXI+ aV 251d1/4 ceazrzaek
515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 55117 -1600
(651) 766 -4029 / FAX: (651) 766 -4048
Email: cityhall @ci .little - canada.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Fahey and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joel Hanson, City Administrator
DATE: February 23, 2001
RE: TIF Legislative Issues
MAYOR
Michael 1. Fahey
COUNCIL
Beverly Scalze
Jim LaValle
Ma[[ Anderson
Rick Montour
ADMINISTRATOR
Joel R. Ranson
At the last Council meeting a question was raised regarding legislative proposals aimed at
further restricting Tax Increment Financing. There have been two principle proposals.
They are:
• Senate File 65 introduced by Senator Marty that would prohibit the certification of
new and modified TIF Districts after May 31, 2001. This bill would also repeal the
tax abatement law and further restrict the use of other business subsidies. I am told
by the League of Minnesota Cities' legislative staff that this bill is not progressing.
♦ Senate File 73 (House Companion 187). This bill requires that Tax Increment
Financing Districts certified prior to May 1, 1990 (Country Drive District 2 -1) may
no longer modify their TIF plans after April 30, 2001. Furthermore, revenues derived
from tax increments must be committed to an activity that is subject to contract or
bond repayments by April 30, 2002 (see attached bills for exact wording). In the case
of Country Drive, this would mean we would have to have purchased the remaining
properties and /or have a development agreement in place that would expend funds
pursuant to our plan by April 30, 2002. If we do not complete our activities by that
date, we would be unable to continue with our redevelopment program.
In discussing Senate File 73 with Ramsey County officials, I was informed
that the goal of this legislation was to prevent plan modifications /pooling that would
extend the life of the district beyond the program that was initially contemplated.
Ramsey County favors this concept in order to get TIF Districts back on the tax rolls
once the initial development program has been accomplished. However, the
proposal as written appears to provide even greater restrictions.
Page 43
Attached is some information Ramsey County provided us with at recent meeting of city
managers. They contend that the percent of Ramsey County tax base captured by TIF has
not been declining even though a number of districts have been decertified. They are also
concerned about the percentage of tax base captured by TIF Districts thereby restricting
their ability to generate tax dollars to support County programs.
It is my recommendation that we inform the Legislature that SF 73 should not prohibit
cities from completing redevelopment programs that were contemplated in the original
TIF plan. It is my opinion, the issue involving pooling is not a major concern to our
community given the status of our TIF Districts (other Ramsey County jurisdictions feel
much stronger about this issue). Therefore, I do not recommend a position on that
provision.
Page 44
S.F No. 73, as introduced
I =`
Minnesota Senate
Page 1 of 2
Legislature Home 1 Search 1 Help 1 Links to the World
Senate' ;l] Legisfaton &,15111 Statues jti taws, ` Statutes & Ruies,1 Joint Deists- & Commissionst
KEY: ctrickcn - old language to be removed
underscored = new language to be added
NOTE: If you cannot see any difference in the key above, you need to change the display of stricken
and /or underscored language.
Authors and Status • List versions
S.F No. 73, as introduced: 82nd Legislative Session (2001 -2002) Posted on Jan 10, 2001
1.1 A bill for an act
1.2 relating to taxation; prohibiting modification and
1.3 limiting expenditures of certain tax increment
1.4 financing districts; proposing coding for new law in
1.5 Minnesota Statutes, chapter 469.
1.6 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
1.7 Section 1. [469.1792] [CERTAIN DISTRICTS; LIMITATIONS.]
1.8 Subdivision 1. [TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN MODIFICATION
1.9 PROHIBITED.] Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, no
1.10 tax increment financing district the certification of which was
1.11 requested before May 1, 1990 may modify its tax increment
1.12 financing plan after April 30, 2001.
1.13 Subd. 2. [LIMITS ON USE OF TAX INCREMENT REVENUES.] la)_
1.14 After April 30, 2001, revenues derived from tax increments by a
1.15 tax increment financing district the certification of which was
1.16 requested before May 1, 1990, may be expended on an activity as
1.17 defined under section 469.1763, subdivision 2, only if one of
1.18 the following occurs:
1.19 (1) on or before April 30, 2002, the revenues are actually
1.20 paid to a third party with respect to the activity]
1.21 (2) bonds, the proceeds of which must be used to finance
1.22 the activity, are issued and sold to a third party on or before
1.23 April 30, 2002, the revenues are spent to repay the bonds, and
1.24 the proceeds of the bonds either are, on the date of issuance,
1.25 reasonably expected to be spent on or before April 30, 2002, or
2.1 are deposited in a reasonably required reserve or replacement
2.2 fund;
2.3 (3) binding contracts with a third party are entered into
2.4 for performance of the activity on or before April 30, 2002, and
2.5 the revenues are spent under the contractual obligation; or
2.6 (4) costs with respect to the activity are paid on or
2.7 before April 30, 2002, and the revenues are spent to reimburse a
2.8 party for payment of the costs, including interest on
2.9 unreimbursed costs.
2.10 (b) For purposes of this section, bonds include subsequent
2.11 refunding bonds if the original refunded bonds meet the
2.12 requirements of paragraph (a), clause L2).
2.13 (c) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to extend the
2.14 duration of a district beyond the earlier of:
2.15 Si) the duration limit of the district as established in
2.16 its tax increment financing plan; or
2.17 (2) the duration limit of the district as established by
2.18 law.
2.19 Subd. 3. [USE OF REVENUES FOR DECERTIFICATION.] (a) For
2.20 any tax increment financing district subject to subdivision 2,
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/cgi-bin/
Page 45
;ession =1s82 2/23/01
S.F No. 73, as introduced Page 2 of 2
2.21 any revenues derived from tax increments paid by properties in
2.22 the district that remain after the expenditures permitted under
2.23 subdivision 2 must be used only to pay:
2.24 L1) outstandinq bonds, as defined in subdivision 2,
2.25 paragraphs (a)s clause (2), and (b)j
2.26 (2L contractual obligations, as defined in subdivision 2,_
2.27 paragraph (a), clauses (3) and (4); or
2.28 L3) credit enhanced bonds as defined in section 469.1763,
2.29 subdivision 5, to which the revenues derived from tax increments
2.30 are pledged, but only to the extent that revenues of the
2.31 district for which the credit enhanced bonds were issued are
2.32 insufficient to pay the bonds and to the extent that the
2.33 increments from the applicable pooling percent share for the
2.34 district are insufficient.
2.35 (b) When the outstandinq bonds have been defeased and when
2.36 sufficient money has been set aside to pay contractual
3.1 obligations as defined in subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clauses
3.2 (3) and (4), the district must be decertified and the aledge of
3.3 tax increment discharged.
3.4 [EFFECTIVE DATE.] This section is effective the day
3.5 following final enactment for districts for which the request
3.6 for certification was made before May 1, 1990.
http: / /www. revisor .Ieg.state.mn.us /cgi- bin/bld
Page 46
;ion =1s32 2/23/01
H.F No. 187, as introduced
Minnesota
House of Representatives
Page 1 of 2
Legislature Home I Search 1 Help I Links to the World
House ;(,l Senate?: j`, Legislation & BIIS Status h' Laws„ Statutes -& Miler 'l; Jaint`.Depts.. &Commissions,
KEY: ctrickcn - old language to be removed
underscored = new language to be added
NOTE: If you cannot see any difference in the key above, you need to change the diplay_of stricken
and/or underscored language.
Authors and Status • List versions
H.F No. 187, as introduced: 82nd Legislative Session (2001 -2002) Posted on Jan 18, 2001
1.1 A bill for an act
1.2 relating to taxation; prohibiting modification and
1.3 limiting expenditures of certain tax increment
1.4 financing districts; proposing coding for new law in
1.5 Minnesota Statutes, chapter 469.
1.6 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
1.7 Section 1. [469.1792] [CERTAIN DISTRICTS; LIMITATIONS.]
1.8 Subdivision 1. [TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN MODIFICATION
1.9 PROHIBITED.] Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, no
1.10 tax increment financing district the certification of which was
1.11 requested before May 1, 1990, may modify its tax increment
1.12 financing plan after April 30, 2001.
1.13 Subd. 2. [LIMITS ON USE OF TAX INCREMENT REVENUES.] La)
1.14 After April 30, 2001, revenues derived from tax increments by a
1.15 tax increment financing district the certification of which was
1.16 requested before May 1, 1990, may be expended on an activity as
1.17 defined under section 469.1763, subdivision 2, only if one of
1.18 the following occurs:
1.19 (1) on or before April 30, 2002, the revenues are actually
1.20 paid to a third party with respect to the activity;
1.21 L) bonds, the proceeds of which must be used to finance
1.22 the activity, are issued and sold to a third party on or before
1.23 April 30 2002, the revenues are spent to repay the bonds, and
1.24 the proceeds of the bonds either are, on the date of issuance_
1.25 reasonably expected to be spent on or before April 30, 2002, or
2.1 are deposited in a reasonably required reserve or replacement
2.2 fund;
2.3 L) binding contracts with a third party are entered into
2.4 for performance of the activity on or before April 30, 2002, and
2.5 the revenues are spent under the contractual obligation; or
2.6 (4L costs with respect to the activity are paid on or
2.7 before April 30, 2002, and the revenues are spent to reimburse a
2.8 party for payment of the costs, including interest on
2.9 unreimbursed costs.
2.10 (b) For purposes of this section, bonds include subsequent
2.11 refunding bonds if the original refunded bonds meet the
2.12 requirements of paragraph (a), clause (2).
2.13 (c) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to extend the
2.14 duration of a district beyond the earlier of:
2.15 ED the duration limit of the district as established in
2.16 its tax increment financing plant or
2.17 (2) the duration limit of the district as established by
2.18 law.
2.19 Subd. 3. [USE OF REVENUES FOR DECERTIFICATION.] ia) For
2.20 any tax increment financing district subject to subdivision 2
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/cgi-b
Page 47
l &session =ls82
2/23/01
H.F No. 187, as introduced Page 2 of 2
2.21 any revenues derived from tax increments paid by properties in
2.22 the district that remain after the expenditures permitted under
2.23 subdivision 2 must be used only to pay:
2.24 (1) outstanding bonds, as defined in subdivision 2r
2.25 paragraphs (a), clause (21, and (b)t
2.26 (2) contractual obligations, as defined in subdivision 2,
2.27 paragraph (a), clauses (3j and L); or
2.28 (3) credit enhanced bonds as defined in section 469.1763,_
2.29 subdivision 5, to which the revenues derived from tax increments
2.30 are pledged, but only to the extent that revenues of the
2.31 district for which the credit enhanced bonds were issued are
2.32 insufficient to pay the bonds and to the extent that the
2.33 increments from the applicable pooling percent share for the
2.34 district are insufficient.
2.35 (b) When the outstanding bonds have been defeased and when
2.36 sufficient money has been set aside to pay contractual
3.1 obligations as defined in subdivision 2, paragraph La,, clauses
3.2 (3) and (4), the district must be decertified and the pledge of
3.3 tax increment discharged_
3.4 [EFFECTIVE DATE.] This section is effective the day
3.5 following final enactment for districts for which the request
3.6 for certification was made before May 1, 1990.
http:// www. revisor.leg.state.mn.us /cgi -Uin Page 48 ;session =1s82 2/23/01
N
w
CO iL
4 • •
- G)
E
O
U
N X
E
C4 .Q
445 - -0 �
Q.
(Q
U
co
N-
O)
CO
0)
0)
0)
O
Cc)
O
O
0)
0
0)
0)
00
CO
co
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
N
CO
CO
O
O
O
ti
co
N 0 CO
r r
O
co
co V N O
�Il Aq paanldeo ase8 xel (1uno3 Aaswed 40 oho
Tax Payable Year
c o
C '
>
>
N
d O
U J
0 <
Er U
N L
CL i
O 0)
�. 0
c �[
C
O • >.
U .9
amid
CIS
a m
E
a
-o 0
0
14 m
a0
o
a. _
Page 49
(suouI!w) sJepop;uawanui xel
0
Tax Payable Year
la Base Rate Excess - Net TIF to Other Districts ❑ Net TIF to Downtown Di
Page 50
Ramsey County
% of Municipal Tax Base Captured by Tax Increment
For Taxes Payable in 1998
Munlclpality
Arden Hills
Blaine
Falcon Heights
Gem Lake
Lauderdale
Little Canada
Maplewood
Mounds View
New Brighton
North Oaks
North SI Paul
Roseville
St Anthony
St Paul
Shoreview
Spring Lake Park
Vadnais Heights
While Bear Lake
While Bear Township
% of Tax Base Total
Captured by Tax Increment
T.I. Dlstrlcts Dollars
091% 5121,543
0.00% 0
5.54% 190.114
0.00% 0
10.11% 164,251
5.43% 472,661
2.02% 925.074
21.70 °A 1,991,196
12,49% 2.531.316
0.00% 0
3.81% 278,100
12.13% 6.059,044
14.15% 403,463
7.24% 16.032,002
6.39% 1,644,190
0.00% 0
10.70% 1.538.693
6.34% 1.226.005
12.88% 1,314,097
.e ,.e.:nemley eo,..n. norm R°enme • Re,e.,en
wweo.emmen,, Pay ne:e,,,R wmomlrsn
Ramsey County
% of Municipal Tax Base Captured by Tax Increment
For Taxes Payable in 1999
Municipality
Arden Hills
Blaine
Falcon Heighls
Gem Lake
Lauderdale
Lillie Canada
Maplewood
Mounds View
New Bdghlon
North Oaks
North SI Paul
Roseville
St Anthony
SI Paul
Shoreview
Spring Lake Park
Vadnais Heighls
While Bear Lake
W11ile Bear Township
% of Tax Base Total
Captured by Tax Increment
T.1. Districts Dollars
2.34% 5314,290
0.00% 0
5.67% 217,209
0.00% 0
10,72% 208.927
3.87% 363.536
1.03% 493,195
21.68% 1,950,393
1745% 2,666.604
0.00% 0
4.34% 336.692
13,35% 6.993,178
17.74% 520,653
8.03% 16.156.451
5.92% 1,543.197
0.00% 0
10.61°0 1,553,433
7.31% 1.491,408
12.82% 1.377,001
Pre/Wed by- R.Il. nom. m en +r, a nam
L°e.Ga,mmem. Pnky A nns,,e e el
02114101
Ramsey County
% of Municipal Tax Base Captured by Tax Increment
For Taxes Payable in 2000
Municipality
Arden Hills
Blaine
Falcon Heights
Gem Lake
Lauderdale
Lillie Canada
Maplewood
Mounds View
New Brighton
North Oaks
North SI Paul
Roseville
SI Anthony
SI Paul
Shoreview
Spring Lake Park
Vadnais Heights
White Bear Lake
While Bear Township
% of Tax Base 1 Total I
Captured by Tax increment 1
T.I. Districts 1 Dollars 1
4.30% 5604.8521
0.00% 01
5,64% 213,3361
0.00% 0
10.14% 201.951)
2.10% 188.4151
1.01% 500.729,
22.23/ 2.049,6181
14.23% 2 878,2391
0.00% 01
3.17% 261 .7041
15.69% 8,453,600,
19.13% 594.881i
9.02% 21 304.714,
6.11% 1.612.136E
0.00% 0,
10.36 94 � 1.5834701
8.30% 1.339,413;
10.39% ! 1.189,692:
tntflo.m.,ov .n ir .1 Pioorly °,�,e,� pee °,ee,
, OZ/$4,0
.n
Page 51
Number of Tax Increment Districts in Ramsey County
O O 0
v
o2
O Q
O
C _ •
O N N
0 a
W N
O N
H N
U
O > I
O
0 <
N O N O
0 O
N
M
o
LL O 15
Q
it
O
N V O cp
O
H
N
O
U
<0
N
0)
O
N
Cr, N
.- 0
N
N
0 CO N
N 0
O N
04
M
d
N
M
O
04
N
(0
N
co
N
O
N
04
N
N 0 r
N
N
M iM
r
•0)
N c0 CO
O
co N
0)
N M
a
L
r N
0 0 m s y 3
a t m 3 0 d rn� H >.
_E . 0 0 m 0> r X o. L I O N c
c C —
N c O J a N v "C m r C aN) c O N c d v I 0 0
U E 2 o N ,O < 0, O a N
'i G m LL s J J 2 Z Z Z L n (W m>? 5, I-
Page 52
MAYOR
Michael I. Fahey
COUNCIL
Beverly Scalze
Jim LaValle
Matt Anderson
Rick Montour
515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada. MN 55117 -1600 ADMINISTRATOR
(651) 766 -4029 / FAX: (651) 766 -4048 Joel R. Hanson
Email: cityhall @ci.little- canada.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Fahey & Members of the City Council
FROM: Joel Hanson, City Administrator
Greg Schroeder, Public Works Director
DATE: February 22, 2001
RE: Purchase of Dump /Snowplow Truck
Based on our experience in purchasing dump /snowplow trucks over the Last few years, staff
included in the 2001 budget $50,000 for the purchase of a good used truck. After the budget was
approved, we undertook a more earnest effort to find our truck. Unfortunately, we determined
that the availability of good condition used trucks is very limited. The deals we found back in
1993 and 1996 when we purchased the 1984 and 1986 trucks are no longer there. Good used
trucks today are holding a higher resale value, sometimes even higher than we experienced in
1999 when we purchased the 1992 truck. In our search, we found a 1994 used truck that met our
needs. However, before we could initiate a deal on this truck, it was sold to another buyer. Our
search led us to a 1990 truck that was being used by the Anoka County Airport. However, even
though the truck was in excellent condition, the plows needed to be replaced which would raise
the cost of the truck to a point where it was not a very good value for the City. We also missed
bidding on a 1995 truck at Coon Rapids that sold for $41,300. We did not receive the bid notice
until after the due date for submission of bids.
During our search for a good used truck, we found a brand new 2000 truck on the lot of one of
the local dealers. You may recall that during the 2001 budget discussions, we indicated that we
had looked at the purchase of a new truck. However, the lifecycle cost based on State bid prices
could not justify its purchase. This is shown on the attached table which shows the lifecycle cost
for a 2001 truck to be much higher than the lifecycle cost of the 1984, 1986, and 1992 truck. For
reference, I also included the lifecycle cost of the 1990 truck that we were looking at, the 1994
truck that we were also trying to purchase, and the 1995 Coon Rapids truck. As can be seen on
this table, the life cycle cost for the 2000 new truck is much lower than a 2001 truck. The reason
for this is that the 2000 truck costs shown are lower than the 2000 State bid prices due to the fact
that this truck was a cancellation by another buyer which resulted in this truck sitting on the lot
incurring interest to the dealer. As a result, we were able negotiate a very good deal for the City
H: \KrisP \CORRESP \Kris' 2001 \Trnck.doc
Page 53
(almost $11,000 less than a new 2001 truck at State bid prices), bringing the overall lifecycle
cost down to a more reasonable number.
Even though we only budgeted $50,000 in our capital improvement budget for 2001, we can
generate sufficient funds to cover the purchase of' the 2000 truck. Given that we have an
opportunity to purchase a new truck for a price that may not be available again, we believe this
purchase will provide a good long -term value for the City even though a used truck purchased at
the right price may have a lower economic impact. If the Council agrees with our logic, we
would recommend authorization to purchase the 2000 truck at a total package price including
truck box and plow for $81,896.
The total cost for the new truck, after being fully equipped is as follows:
Truck $48,100
Box & Plows 28,798
Sales Tax 4 999
$81,896
II: \KrisP \CORRESP \Kris' 2001 \Truck.dac
Page 54
Replace Wile New
1000 Truck
r,
s
C
1
Page 55